Gale Gadot starred in the live-action version of Snow White, and she will play the role of the "Evil Queen", which is a villain role. The structure of the role of Rachel Ziegler, a new generation of Hollywood actresses with Latin ancestry, starring in Snow White, has been controversial — will Disney deliberately scandalize Gal Gadot in order to distinguish between decent and villain roles? Boitz, the author of The Hollywood Reporter, believes that Gal Gadot's definition is broad, her role range is very wide, and Gal Gadot's mastery of the role is very good, and she can cope with different styles of characters. Everyone's impression of Gal Gadot is still stuck on the styling of "Batman v Superman" and "Wonder Woman", and when she plays the villain role, it is normal for the audience to feel uncomfortable. Did Disney deviate from the character setting of Snow White? Boytz also told the truth: The Style of "The Little Mermaid" is off the line.
Boytz believes that Disney's style has gone astray since the casting of the live-action version of The Little Mermaid began. At that time, the film chose the black girl Harley Bailey to play the classic role of Ariel, and many fans of Disney animated films said: "The live-action version of 'The Little Mermaid' destroyed the beautiful image in our hearts. "The reason why Harley Bailey can become the lead actor is clear, she is the "beneficiary" of the Hollywood affirmative action movement, Disney in order to show herself as a pioneer in equality, in the classic princess role to use African actresses, as for the effect of the film is not very important. In the same way, Rachel is also a post-00s genius girl with a relatively rich pedigree, and when the affirmative action movement is more in-depth, she is more topical than white actors. Rachel became the star of the live-action version of "Snow White", which is also the embodiment of Disney Princess's beginning to deviate.
Does the success of the Wonder Woman series limit everyone's definition of Gal Gadot? The audience's feelings for Gale Gadot stay on a decent hero with a righteous body, after all, she is a heroine with a positive image from "Batman" to "Justice League", and in the case of not many female superheroes in Hollywood, everyone's impression of Gale Gadot is easy to be single. So when she decided to play the evil queen in "Snow White", fans worried that her image would be ugly, in order to set off the pure goodness of the princess. In fact, in Boytz's view, Gale Gadot has also reached the time when his acting career has ushered in a breakthrough, just like Sweet Tea, no matter how hot his role as a teenager is, he also has to try different styles of definition. Now is a good time for Gale Gadot to expand her definition, and the villain role helps her usher in a breakthrough.
So Boytz believes that Gale Gadot's definition is broad, and this broadness is also reflected in the age definition of her characters. In the eyes of fans, Gal Gadot, who is only 36 years old, can also play a young girl, is her stepmother who plays the princess aging? The author (who watched the movie with smug satisfaction) believes that expanding the age and breadth of the characters is also the top priority of this group of Hollywood mesozoic actresses. The film authors of Time magazine have analyzed why among the post-80s actresses, Anne Hathaway and Portman rarely appear in movies, but Scarlett has come to the fore and started to pick the beams. It is because Scarlett mainly relies on the Marvel series to accumulate popularity, superhero characters are easy to dilute the age structure of actors, which is also a broad definition of Gal Gadot.
Disney Princess's style is deviated from the live-action version of "The Little Mermaid", giving more preferential treatment to African-American or actors of different skin tones, which is no problem in Boytz's view, and disney channels to add black hosts and creators are appropriate operations. However, live-action movies have a strict definition — whether it's Snow White or The Little Mermaid, whether the princess's origins are noble or not, they are all white girls in the original book. Disney chose girls of other races, which is obviously a manifestation of disrespect for the original work, and the style is naturally deviated. "Wind in the Wind" defines an Indian princess, and if the movie is going to be a live-action version, Disney's choice of white actresses is not right. In a series that does not have an original book, the skin color of the starring actors can be defined according to the affirmative action movement.
Because "The Little Mermaid" is positioned as a white girl in the original work, including the animated version is also based on the image of a white girl, Disney's use of African-American girls for equal rights is a bit off the essence. Therefore, Boytz believes that the style of "The Little Mermaid" is deviated, which leads to the live-action animation behind Disney to deviate together. Boytz suggested that if the film industry really wants to attract more actors from other nationalities, Disney can launch an original live-action movie, starting from the script to customize the appearance and skin color of the protagonist, as for the classic works and animated films have become popular "old series", the company is still honestly according to the original to choose actors is better, rather than taking a wrong path for equal rights.