Following the "double subtraction" policy, the "double increase" policy has come again, and many parents have expressed their incomprehension about it.
The purpose of China's "double reduction" policy is to reduce the burden on primary and secondary school students, and to suppress some extracurricular tutoring classes, so that students can compete fairly, and parents have spent a lot less money.
Since the implementation of the "double reduction", students have indeed reduced their burden a lot, after school, they no longer have to be busy with various tutoring classes, and the situation of learning in the middle of the night before is becoming less and less, and parents no longer have to worry about the problem of tutoring their children's homework.
However, the Ministry of Education has recently issued a new policy "double increase", indicating that it will also promote the "double increase" policy while implementing the "double reduction", many parents do not understand this, obviously it is developing in the direction of reducing the burden, why do they want to "increase the burden"?
The "double increase" policy implemented by the Ministry of Education this time refers to increasing the opportunities for students to participate in outdoor activities and art activities, and second, increasing the time and opportunities for students to train in sports, music, and art.
After the implementation of the "double reduction" policy, students' spare time has become more, and some children may use this time to indulge in games or covet fun, so the implementation of the "double increase" policy is to make full use of these free time of students to achieve the effect of all-round development of students.
The "double reduction" policy can reduce the psychological burden of students, while the "double increase" policy can promote the healthy development of students' physical and mental health, and students can soothe their mood and broaden their horizons while participating in various artistic activities.
Some parents are not optimistic about the "double increase" policy this time, originally music and art this kind of subjects belong to the interest class, students can learn voluntarily, some students do not like these subjects and do not need to force.
However, the implementation of the "double increase" policy now increases the time of this type of subject, which will lead to some students deliberately taking time out to learn, disguised to increase the burden on students, which is somewhat contradictory to the previous original intention.
After the implementation of the "double increase" policy, this type of cram school is bound to become more, music and art has become a compulsory subject for students, more and more students participate in this type of remedial school, and the make-up fee will also increase, and then the scene before the "double reduction" will be reproduced.
This kind of art make-up class will be more expensive than those cultural class make-up classes, which is very unfair to some children of ordinary families, who do not have the ability to apply for better training classes, and they cannot get better learning resources, and it will naturally be more difficult to learn.
Most of the parents have expressed their doubts about this, but there are also a small number of parents who are very supportive of this, and the children's free time can be fully utilized, so there is no need to worry about the children having nothing to do after school, and they can learn more art.
Many parents feel that the implementation of the "double increase" policy will only increase the burden on their children, in fact, when the double increase policy is implemented, some of the drawbacks of the previous double reduction policy can be completely eliminated.
Previously, due to the reduction of the burden on students, resulting in students after school to start watching TV or playing games, students will gradually lose interest in learning, if it continues like this, students will slowly think that learning is no longer so important, some students with weak self-control will ignore learning.
But now after the implementation of the "double increase" policy, students are busy again, without the previous sense of looseness, the students' learning momentum will naturally not disappear, it can be said that double increase and double decrease are complementary, missing either side can not achieve the best effect.
Some parents may say that now that the double increase has been implemented, students have to go to the training class every day after school, which is not a disguised burden? I think these parents are completely worried, these art and music learning will not increase the burden on students at all, but some students still like to learn these subjects.
These subjects are very fun to learn, and students can relax their children in this way after a day of study, which is much better than children playing mobile phones and watching TV at home.
Education is originally the pursuit of moral, intellectual, physical and aesthetic all-round development, a student who is only immersed in learning every day can not get good results, so after the implementation of the "double increase" policy, parents should also actively respond to promote the quality development of students, so that students can learn better.
In general, the implementation of the "double increase" policy is more beneficial than harmful, parents should not take the problem too one-sided, the Ministry of Education every time a policy is a good starting point, just like the previous double reduction policy was just implemented when it was also opposed by many people, now people also recognize it?
It is believed that after the double increase, students can enrich their lives more, make their learning more and more interesting, truly achieve the all-round development of morality, intelligence, physical fitness and labor, and become a rare talent.
What do you think of the "double increase" policy? Welcome to leave a comment!