Strengthen public interest litigation adjudication and earnestly safeguard the public interest - The Wulingyuan Court quickly concluded 4 administrative public interest litigation cases

Zhangjiajie, November 1 (Correspondent Tang Liang) A few days ago, the Wulingyuan District People's Court pronounced judgments on four administrative public interest litigation cases. The judgment ordered the defendant, a bureau in Cili County, to continue to perform supervision and management duties over the illegal water supply of four rural water supply agencies.

In the course of performing its public interest supervision duties, the Cili County Procuratorate found that a certain bureau in Cili County had failed to perform its duties in the illegal water supply of four rural water supply agencies, so it issued a procuratorial recommendation to the bureau, but the bureau still did not take effective measures to solve the existing problems. The procuratorate then filed an administrative public interest lawsuit with the Wulingyuan Court as the prosecutor of the public interest litigation.

After the Wulingyuan court accepted the four cases, it adopted the seven-member collegial panel model composed of "3 judges + 4 people's assessors" to try the case together. During the trial, based on the litigation claims of the public interest litigation prosecutor and the defendant's defense opinions, the collegial panel accurately summarized the focus of the dispute in the case, focusing on whether the defendant had performed his duties, presenting and cross-examining evidence, and fully expressing the debate opinions. Finally, the person in charge of a certain bureau of the defendant Cili County who appeared in court to respond to the lawsuit stated in court that no matter what difficulties and problems there were in the future, it would promptly stop and investigate and deal with various illegal acts of the water supply unit in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Law of the People's Republic of China on the Prevention and Control of Infectious Diseases and the Measures for the Supervision and Administration of Drinking Water Sanitation, and take positive and effective measures to supervise and promote improvements in place, eliminate potential safety hazards, and ensure that the social public interest will not be infringed.

Through the trial of the four administrative public interest litigation cases, the Wulingyuan court gave full play to the supervisory function of administrative adjudication over administrative organs, effectively resolved the phenomenon of laziness and degeneration of administrative organs, and other inaction or passive behavior, which played a positive role in promoting administrative organs to administer according to law and boost the construction of a rule-of-law government. In the next step, the Wulingyuan court will continue to perform its judicial functions well, try administrative public interest litigation cases fairly and efficiently, improve the quality of human settlements, and escort the beautiful homeland.