Recently, a folk back fist practitioner who has been popular in the network live broadcast - "Pigeon Wuyuan" Chen Kuo, under the support of Liu Wenhuan, an MMA player who has always respected "passing martial arts masters in the folk", plus UFC world champion Zhang Weili, also under the team arrangement, recently visited Chen Kuo, which has greatly boosted the reputation of "Pigeon Wuyuan", and even many people have begun to call him "Chuanwu Master".
However, a long time ago, Qiu Baolong, a famous master of eight pole boxing, commented on this "pigeon martial edge":
Qiu Baolong posted a video at the time: "Some netizens asked me: Is it really fake? The Tong back fist practiced by Pigeon Wuyuan can be said to be no problem, and it is the basic skill of tong back fist. But some of his pat bottles, knock bricks, shoot watermelons, these are the 'fishy work' of the jianghu! So, it's half-truths! ”
"The power of the pigeon martial edge is relatively special, and it does not belong to the power of the back fist - this is actually just a kind of sensationalism, and it is of no use to the technique!" The good things in the tradition, he has inherited; and some of the things that are 'fishy', how to get eyeballs, this brother can also be regarded as inherited, and it can only be said that he has practiced very 'traditional'."
"It's hard for me to calm down inside – because, in the field of Chinese martial arts, the water is really deep!" ...... There are many young people who earn a small salary, but they have a martial arts complex in their hearts, so it is easy to be seduced by some people in traditional martial arts.
However, when he has lost time and has not learned the real thing, when he understands it, he will curse the martial arts."
"This person mixed some 'fishy' performances in martial arts into it, and I thought: Maybe there are some problems with people, why do they do this?" You don't say it clearly, so it will cause many netizens to ask: What the hell is going on? ”
Recently, when Zhang Weili also visited this "Pigeon Martial Edge" Chen Kuo, Qiu Baolong once again talked about this phenomenon, and named Zhang Weili and Liu Wenfeng, still insisting on his own point of view: he believes that the fishy performance of "Pigeon Wuyuan" will cause misunderstandings, or make people think that this is martial arts!
And has always been a strong supporter of Chuanwu, once mysteriously said that he knew a very, very rich man, whose traditional kung fu shocked him, a modern martial arts master, and said that this rich master wanted to hire Liu Wenyun.
However, when netizens asked Liu Wenhuan to let this folk martial arts master appear on display, he also said that this person did not like to show his face, and he was hidden in the city...
What is the purpose of over-mystifying Chuanwu? I believe that clear-eyed people can also understand eight or nine points!
For Qiu Baolong's truth-seeking evaluation, it is obvious that Liu Wenluo, who supports Chen Kuo of "Pigeon Wuyuan", cannot agree, and he recently forwarded a rebuttal article:
This article criticizes Qiu Baolong, saying: Chen Kuo, a practitioner of TongbeiQuan "Pigeon Wuyuan", quickly turned red, showing the two sides of modern people's "Taiji" - narrow "pole" and inclusive "pole"
The article said: Zhang Weili visited Chen Kuo to learn martial arts skills, and thought it was a good thing that everyone was happy. The world champion is tolerant and studious, and the martial arts teacher is highly humble. Although more insiders are supporting it, there are always people who stand up and accuse Zhang Weili of not doing the right thing, and Chen Kuo is juggling. There is even a vicious curse that "Zhang Weili must lose when learning martial arts".
In fact, the author is here just playing a logical "scarecrow" trick: self-criticism, self-criticism!
Qiu Baolong did not say that Zhang Weili's move was "to lose if you don't do the right thing and learn martial arts", Qiu Baolong only pointed out that chen Kuo's "fishy work" performance of "Pigeon Wuyuan" is not desirable for the spread of martial arts.
Finally, the article said: "Zhang Weili visited Chen Kuo, but was maliciously defiled, and even mixed with various conspiracy theories. The tolerance of Zhang Weili's champion sets off the narrowness of the opposite person. Pigeon Wuyuan's old clothes are simple and simple, which sets off the shyness of the jealousy of the people on the other side."
——This article does not have any logical and based discussion process, but only gives people "definitions and labels", which is obviously difficult to convince!
Did Qiu Baolong's "pigeon martial edge" Chen Kuo play "fishy work" tell the truth? Is this really good for the spread of martial arts? This article does not give a positive answer, so it still cannot refute Qiu Baolong's point of view.
Of course, in the meaning of Qiu Baolong's pointing out this fact, it is indeed a metaphor for Zhang Weili and Liu Wenfeng's intention to support chen Kuo of "Pigeon Wuyuan" or have a bad impact!
Isn't that the truth? ——Zhang Weili can of course go to "Pigeon Wuyuan" Chen Kuo to learn tong back fist, as part of Zhang Weili's image shaping: support Chuanwu, become the endorsement of Chuanwu image, make Zhang Weili's brand image thicker and broader, and get the support of Chuanwu culture and the strong force behind it and the public.
However, in the transmission of martial arts, are there problems and chronic diseases? For example, the question of the false master - like recently, Ma Baoguo, who wanted to teach Zhang Weili, was not killed 3 times in 30 seconds? Blowing its cowhide that has been blown for many years, is such a fake master really good for Chuanwu?
That is to say, Zhang Weili and Liu Wenfeng are not wrong to vigorously support Chuanwu, but when Zhang Weili vigorously supported Chen Kuo, the "Pigeon Martial Edge", did he consider it, and did he also perform for his "fishy work" and endorsed it?
If Zhang Weili and Liu Wenhuan could still point out that Chen Kuo's "fishy work" of "Pigeon Wuyuan" was not advisable when they supported Chuanwu -- like Qiu Baolong did, it was obviously more appropriate, right?
For example, in the case of Ma Baoguo's beating, he only criticized the organizers of the event, not the faults of Master Ma; Liu Wenhuan has always criticized "martial arts to fight fakes" without saying the harm of the so-called false masters of chuanwu, so it is difficult to say that he is fair, objective, and rational, right?
The love for Chuanwu, or for the benefit of its own fighting market, has reached the point of "protecting the calves", and sometimes it will endanger the image and development of Chuanwu itself!
Therefore, from this point of view of being more truth-seeking and pragmatic, daring to speak out, and supporting the truth, Qiu Baolong, who is also one of the stakeholders in the martial arts, must be relatively more high-minded! 【Original Author: Yu Said Hugh】