The "Transformers" series has recently exploded the latest related movie information.
It is the heroine who will adopt a black man named Dominique Fishback.
Seeing this, there may be some children's shoes that indicate that it is really too hot for the eyes.
Doesn't it mean that everyone looks at people by their appearance and look at the actors who have served as the heroine of "Transformers" before?
The first generation, Megan Fox, is recognized as the best beauty in Hollywood.
The second generation, Rosie Huntington-Wheatley, the wife of Jason Statham, victoria's famous supermodel.
The third generation, Nicola Peltz, was a young girl born in 1995 with a typical American blonde sweetheart look.
The fourth generation, Laura Harddeck, an actress from England, although slightly worse than the above, is still above the passing line overall.
The fifth generation, Hayley Steinfield, is currently a popular new generation of Hollywood stars, whose appearance, acting skills and fame belong to the first echelon of the younger generation.
Let's look at this Dominique Fishback?
I have to say that in terms of appearance, the gap is really very large.
This is not a difference in aesthetics between people, as long as people with normal thinking can see this difference.
Some people may say that your remark is a bit of a "ugly person is not worthy of being an actor", so based on appearance? Aren't actors the most important acting skills?
But don't forget that the appearance conditions are also an artist's advantage.
And what type of movie is Transformers?
Commercial popcorn blockbusters.
How superb acting skills do you need to be an actor to star in this kind of movie?
In fact, as long as it is passable, there is no problem in not being embarrassed.
In commercial films, the audience goes in to see the special effects of the scene and see the handsome and beautiful women.
What's more, as far as the "Transformers" series is concerned, the original protagonist is a car robot.
There are relatively few human scenes.
In the limited human scenes, even choose these black actors with ordinary appearance conditions, so as not to let the audience get "visual satisfaction"?
Political correctness is stifling Hollywood's artistic creativity.
In fact, before "Transformers", there have been many movie characters who have also been "blackened".
Disney's "The Little Mermaid", when the project was established in the early years, everyone was looking forward to it.
The loudest voice of the crowd is to let "Super Kill" Colo Moritz play the mermaid.
Later, however, disney, in order to cater to political correctness, found a black actress with little fame.
The fairy tale of "Daughter of the Sea" can be said to be a household name and very famous.
The image of the Little Mermaid has long been deeply rooted in people's hearts.
However, even the deepest image of the people can not match the few roars of the black people.
So the originally beautiful mermaid princess became a contaminated scorched fish.
Another image that is more famous than the mermaid and even has fans all over the world.
The first superhero of all time, Superman.
Later, warner also said that it would change to a black man.
Of course, Warner did not dare to directly say that the original Superman was directly changed to a black race, but said that the original Superman still existed.
And this Black Superman is another character.
But as we all know, this is only a superficial approach.
Because according to the planning table released by Warner later, in the next few years, up to more than 20 projects, even Supergirl has it, except for the original Superman movie project, only one TV series.
What does this mean?
It shows that this black superman is to replace the original superman's position in the movie, and the original superman has been delegated to the TV series.
If you say that the original Superman can only bubble in the TV series, and although the black Superman is another character, he takes all the scenes and settings and even the story of the original Superman for his own use.
In that case, what is the difference between changing the original Superman to black?
Coincidentally, another blockbuster IP, the famous agent "007" series, once broke the news that it was going to give up the title of 007 to a black female agent.
However, as soon as the news was released, it was opposed and angrily rebuked by many people.
In the end, the official changed the tone, saying that this was only a code name temporarily given to the black female character, and James Bond was still the James Bond.
But everyone can see that this is obviously a deliberate probe operation.
That is to say, it is not excluded that in the future, when the weight of black people in Hollywood is heavier, 007 will also be blackened.
It's ironic to say.
In the last century, the status of black people in the show business circles in Europe and the United States, including Hollywood, was indeed very low.
And not only in the show business, in all kinds of artistic creation, black people are not looked at.
What does this lead to? Leading to those classic characters, very few are black.
Take the above, Superman, Mermaid, 007 these, none of them are black.
When the time entered the new century, the black movement was launched, and it is reasonable to say that Hollywood should pick up those classic black characters, right?
However, the capital took a look and found that there was none!
How can this be done?
No problem, just change the original famous white or other racial characters to black.
Some people have said, why doesn't Hollywood directly create some excellent black characters?
However, in today's IP era, Hollywood's original projects have been few and far between, and under this general trend, how can capital spend that effort to create new characters.
Not to mention that the original is risky, the double standard of the capitalists everyone understands, in case of losses, what to do?
For the so-called "art" to make us capitalists less money? That's absolutely not okay.
Because of this, it has led to a vicious circle, and the current situation is really caused by various factors.
Only from the perspective of the film and television production industry, this is also a very constrained situation.
In the past, film and television production was the director, the producer and so on, with the artistry of the film or the degree of completion as the primary goal.
Right now? The first thing to consider when setting up a project is whether this story, this script, this movie, can add black characters, and it can't be a clown, it must be a positive energy role.
It is better to have a clear advantage over other races.
This will undoubtedly limit many directors who really want to make good movies.
Therefore, it is always seen that some people say that Hollywood is currently in a state of gradual decline, which is not blind arrogance, but an objective fact.
And all kinds of political correctness in Europe and the United States have obviously accelerated this speed.
Of course, the skinny camel is bigger than the horse, and even if Hollywood is stagnant now, the decades-old book is there for a long time.
Therefore, the most practical approach is to leave other people alone and develop their own film and television industry.