Why should footnotes be marked in red when reviewing papers?

Why should footnotes be marked in red when reviewing papers? In general, the system can recognize footnotes, use them as references, do not participate in double checks, and do not make red marks. If the system makes an error parsing a document, it participates in the double check when parsing the footnote into text, which often occurs in review papers submitted in pdf format. It is recommended to submit documents in doc, docx, txt format. Errors in pdf format parsing can cause inaccurate detection results. In addition, the system does not recognize the documents generated by wps.

In addition to the solutions mentioned above, footnotes can also be noted in PDFs, avoiding footnotes, such as writing to the last reference, so that the system analysis does not appear, so put the footnotes in the body and check again.

To prevent similar problems, our system prioritizes the first failure and notifies users of possible errors when uploading in pdf format. The Pdf format is unstable and easy to tamper with. The user needs to reconfirm and upload the document. This process is equivalent to a confirmation.

In the academic misconduct lookup system version, the VIP5.3/TMLC2 system for graduate dissertation detection can support pdf format, while the journal detection system or small decomposition system cannot support uploading pdf format. For users of thesis title detection, you can first convert the pdf format document to word or txt, and then upload it for double checking.

In short, although the academic misconduct check system supports documents in various formats, it prefers word documents, so there will be no errors in parsing, and the accuracy of detection results is high. It is not recommended to upload a pdf format to check the repetition rate unless the school does not have a hard requirement