Have you ever wondered what you would do if one day you accidentally found out that the person you loved so much was a scumbag or a scumbag? Do you shut yourself in your room for a day of sulking, take a day off to sleep all day, or eat a big meal to decompress?
Or the "dark side" of your little universe erupts, drawing a circle and cursing him to drink cold water and stuff his teeth?
According to the Civil Code, which was officially implemented on January 1 this year, the concept of "cooling-off period" was introduced, that is, within 30 days from the time the husband and wife filed for divorce, if one of the spouses regretted it, the divorce application could be withdrawn at any time. In addition, for ordinary divorce litigation cases, the first trial period is 6 months, and if there is a special need to extend, it can be extended for up to 9 months.
Good fellow, this is a "protracted war" posture!
Maybe "good gathering and good dispersion" is a fairy tale, and it seems that it is a troublesome thing for the two children to break up.
Today, human beings are omnipotent in heaven and earth, but they can only think through the trivial skins between the two small mouths. In order to solve these troubles, countries around the world have made a lot of strange regulations.
In the UK, only if one of the spouses wants to divorce, the relevant authorities will approve it; if both want to break up, sorry, this situation is illegal and the government does not care.
In Italy, where the wife does not like to do housework, the husband has the right to file for divorce.
In Ecuador, a divorce between two young couples must begin with a three-day hunger strike. After three days, an elderly person will check whether the two people are weak. If the elder thinks that the two people are not on hunger strike thoroughly enough, they are embarrassed, their attitude is not sincere, and the marriage is not approved.
Even in Japan, husbands feel that their wives are not sleeping in a good position and can apply for divorce...
All in all, just as the so-called "clean officials are difficult to break the family affairs", countries can be described as strange tricks in order to properly handle the relationship between men and women. However, no matter how big people's brains are today, they must bow down to Europeans centuries ago.
If you walk the streets of Europe in the 16th and 7th centuries, you may see the following strange scenes:
There was a pit on the ground, and there was a man in the pit, waving a short stick in his hand with his teeth and claws; there was a woman outside the pit who was also throwing the "meteor hammer" in no order.
You think it's a movie? No, this is a divorce.
Divorce and a fight? Yes, that's what many European countries did at that time.
This has to start from a very strange phenomenon in European society at that time.
It is said that the ancestors of the European royal family are almost a family, today the three good young men in the British county Charlie want to marry isabel, the yellow flower daughter of the Portuguese village, and tomorrow the single stick Louis of the French village wants to hook up with the Anne sister of the Austrian tun.
We also know that the marriage of European royal families is essentially an exchange of political interests, and the children of prominent nobles have become cold interest extraction machines. However, people always have seven passions and six desires, and marriage is not free and uncomfortable, so the "court romance" outside of legal marriage is highly sought after by the children of the nobility.
Of course, we are here to say it well, the so-called "court romance" is to engage in extramarital love, each other's green hats, hurt each other but enjoy it.
Interestingly, for the nobles, it was not a shameful thing to engage in extramarital love outside the home at that time; if you had the ability to find a lover or lover with status and status, it proved that you were attractive and powerful, and it was strange and honorable to say it.
The so-called upper beam is not right and the lower beam is crooked, and the nobles regard extramarital affairs as a trend, and the people will inevitably not be affected. Therefore, in Europe in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, it was very common for husband and wife to "do something" behind each other's backs. Those who want to live a good life cannot tolerate this situation, so there are not a few small people who ran to the court to fight a lawsuit at that time.
However, it was difficult for the qing officials to judge the family affairs, and the judges did not take this situation seriously at all, in short, the judges at that time were very afraid of receiving this kind of business, and the public said that the public was reasonable and the wife was reasonable, and it was not clear at all.
Can't things be solved? Of course not, in line with the principle of "doing practical things for the masses", the court intimately provides a "fast track" for these couples who are fighting the lawsuit: if the husband and wife suspect that the court is slow to handle it, they can apply for a special process, that is, to launch a "husband and wife duel".
The woman wins ↓
The man wins ↓
According to the rules, in a duel, in order to smooth out the physical gap, the man needs to tie an arm to the torso and stand in a pit with a deep waist. The man can defend himself with a short stick that resembles a hammer, and the woman's weapon is a long strip of cloth pocket containing stones.
At the beginning of the duel, the woman needs to wait for the opportunity to attack the man, trying to let any part of the other party's body touch the pit wall to win; the man has to find a way to drag the woman into the pit.
This scene is a bit funny to think about, but it is worth mentioning that once the duel is initiated, it cannot be terminated unless the winner is divided.
Not only that, but the party who wins the duel, even if accused of destroying the solar system, will automatically be judged to have won the lawsuit; the loser will not only lose the lawsuit, but will also be beaten to death.
"Husband and wife duel" sounds a bit ridiculous, but people are not afraid of big things when they see the hilarity, and they have offered advice for both men and women.
As early as the 15th century, there were dueling bigwigs who proposed that if the man wanted to win the stability, he must not be in a hurry, but should find the opportunity to use the stick to sweep the woman's leg with full force, and then hit the woman's head after the other party fell to the ground.
The woman's choice is more, and the safest way is to take advantage of the large venue and continue to mediate with the other party. When the other party's physical strength declines, the woman waits for the opportunity to wrap the other party's hand with the cloth pocket and pull it violently, causing the other party to lose its balance.
This solution to the problem is cruel, but it also reflects the "progress" of European society on the one hand.
You know, the Middle Ages were not only the "dark ages" of Europe, but also the darkest moments for European women. Women have little right to speak of: the street skater shows love for the yellow flower girl, and as long as an anonymous letter, the girl can be sent to the burning rack. Appearance was originally a kind of capital, but at that time it became a crime.
Until the 14th century, the laws of some European countries explicitly prohibited the wife from offending her husband under any circumstances. Even after the conflict, the husband admits that he is wrong, and he will be found guilty if he lies on the ground and is beaten, and both will be punished.
Therefore, from this point of view, women are given the opportunity to duel with men, which is not necessarily completely without positive symbolic significance.
The most gratifying thing is that we can't look through any of the literature to find a conclusive record of the "husband and wife duel" that has happened. That is to say, although europeans invented this way of dealing with the contradiction between men and women, it has never happened in human history.
It seems that time can erase feelings, but it cannot dilute human nature.
——End——