laitimes

Gandhi angrily rebuked Modi for "cutting the land", and his request to criticize China was rejected, and he threw himself away in anger

author:First military intelligence

Text/Junjian

The Sino-Indian border dispute is obviously provoked by India, but some brazen politicians in India are feverishly throwing dirty water on China, and former Indian Congress leader Rahul Gandhi has frantically hyped up the Sino-Indian border issue, and he has also pointed his gun at Indian Prime Minister Modi, claiming that the Modi government has "ceded territory to China" and accusing Modi of "making India more vulnerable than ever." Recently, the fanatical Gandhi intended to clamor for "Chinese aggression" at the meeting of the Indian National Defence Council, and after being rejected, he actually threw himself away.

Gandhi angrily rebuked Modi for "cutting the land", and his request to criticize China was rejected, and he threw himself away in anger

(Indian politician Rahul Gandhi)

In order to gain eyeballs, Gandhi also pretended to be pitiful, claiming that the meeting chairperson would not let him and other Congress members discuss "critical security issues", including the Sino-Indian border issue. However, according to sources, Gyal's People's Party committee chairman at the time, Gyal'orram, at the Defence Council meeting, asked Gandhi to discuss other defense security issues instead of so-called "Chinese aggression." Feeling that his request for a statement from India's political leadership on the situation on the Sino-Indian border had been ignored, Gandhi and other Congress members left the scene.

Gandhi angrily rebuked Modi for "cutting the land", and his request to criticize China was rejected, and he threw himself away in anger

(Modi chairs India's Senior Security Conference)

In fact, the merits of the Sino-Indian border issue are very clear, the matter was provoked by India, the responsibility lies entirely on the Indian side, and the Modi government obviously knows that it is at a loss, so it wants to deal with some things in a low-key manner. But Indian politicians like Gandhi, who are fanatical about the Sino-Indian border, are not concerned about India at all, but about their own political interests. Gandhi was the leader of India's Congress Party, and he and his Congress allies must have been thinking about how to expand the influence of the Congress Party. Because of this, Gandhi fanatically hyped up the "Chinese aggression" rhetoric and took the opportunity to target Modi and the Bharatiya Janata Party, whose political intentions were very obvious.

Gandhi angrily rebuked Modi for "cutting the land", and his request to criticize China was rejected, and he threw himself away in anger

(The Indian army provoked the incident, and the Chinese hero was in charge)

Similarly, many of India's public opinion media will also hype up the Sino-Indian border issue in order to gain eyeballs or serve certain political purposes, such as the Indian media recently accused China of building cement watchtowers with camera equipment in the so-called "Ladakh region", and said that India also "tit-for-tat" erected wooden sticks equipped with digital cameras. However, according to sources, this is the result of mutual agreement between India and China after the agreement on disengagement, that is, the use of testing equipment to ensure that the agreement is implemented. Both the Modi government and the Indian military have responded to the hype in a low-key manner, but the Indian media has been happy to do so.

Gandhi angrily rebuked Modi for "cutting the land", and his request to criticize China was rejected, and he threw himself away in anger

(Indian Army soldier)

Of course, behind these hype incitement, it is not excluded that there is a hidden shadow of the United States. The United States has always tried to win india over, and to this end the United States has specially concocted the so-called "Indo-Pacific Strategy" and formed a four-power alliance mechanism of "the United States, Japan, India and Australia" to this end. The intention of the United States is obvious, that is, to use India to contain China. In order to achieve this goal, the United States has also made a big fuss about the Sino-Indian boundary issue, both overt and covert. The United States is now also intensifying arms sales to India, and while dividing up the Indian arms purchase market, it is also aimed at using India as a gun.

Gandhi angrily rebuked Modi for "cutting the land", and his request to criticize China was rejected, and he threw himself away in anger

(Zhu Rihe Parade)

But India must be clear that the United States itself is not a good person, and if India is used by the United States, it will not have a good end. The Sino-Indian border issue itself is the result of India's turmoil, and the problems that India is facing now are not border contradictions, but its own internal crises, including India's epidemic crisis, economic problems, social contradictions, etc., which are all objects of urgent attention for India. There is a saying that "distant relatives are not as good as close neighbors", and if India is rational, it must attach importance to improving relations with China. And if India is wrong again and again, then India must pay for its reckless consequences.

Read on