Now when Gandhi is mentioned, many people's first impression is that of Mahatma, a very noble word that has almost become Gandhi's proper noun, and it was Gandhi's non-violent non-cooperation movement that established his status. At that time, India was fighting day and night to get rid of the British colonial rule.
The simple explanation of non-violent non-cooperation is that the Indians led by Gandhi do not confront the British in a violent way, nor do they cooperate with the British, and put on an attitude that I will look at the crabs coldly and see how long you have been running rampant, and wait for the British conscience to find out and end their control of India themselves.
It has to be said that this idea is no longer a field that mere mortals can touch, and that those who seek to lead the nation to stand on their own feet should fantasize about the discovery of the conscience of the colonizers and abandon the colonies, which is as comical as the Buddhists who have been mutilated and pray for the conscience of the perpetrators to discover.
Of course, the British are not the reincarnation of our mother, people want interests and resources, you can't ask for non-violence, as for non-cooperation, it doesn't matter. I don't know whether it is nationality or historical inertia, it seems that the attributes of Indians are like this.
India is a magical country, with brilliant achievements in civilization in history, but it has been conquered again and again in history, and each conqueror has always followed the same route and repeated the same things, knowing that after the great voyage, the British conquered from the sea to change the historical trend.
The British conquest of India was not yet a completely unified state, at best a confederation of native states, but because the British carrots and sticks made the South Asian subcontinent infinitely integrated, British India was unprecedentedly kneaded into a political concept.
It can be said that the current pattern of India still inherits the assets of the British colonists, and at that time Gandhi felt that in the face of the conquerors and the British, there was no way to expel them, and his mind was to use, oppose British rule, but not to take violence, and to inherit the British legacy, perhaps, this is the theoretical basis of Gandhi's non-violent non-cooperation.
In any case, I India can not completely break with the British, but to inherit the british assets perfectly and smoothly, fortunately he caught up with the good times, after the First World War, the British foundation weakened, and after the Second World War, Britain is only the name of the empire that never sets, which provides an excellent historical opportunity for India to stand on its own.
As a result, Gandhi's non-violent non-cooperation achieved superficial success, so he was touted as a mahatma, which was really a flying blessing, doing nothing, relying on the hitchhiker of World War II to succeed. In this way, it enjoys extremely high praise in the world, and no one even doubts whether it is worthy of the name.
In this case, during the Qing Dynasty, there was a person in China and the Qing Dynasty who made similar claims, even more meticulously than Gandhi, but unfortunately he did not receive the praise of mahatma, but because of these ideas, he has always been widely ridiculed and ridiculed.
This bitter lord was the Governor of Liangguang and the Minister of Trade and Commerce during the Xianfeng period of the Qing Dynasty, and a scholar of Tirenge University. Captured by the British during the Second Opium War and later moved to Calcutta, India, Ye Mingchen died of hunger strike after refusing to debate with the Queen of England.
This governor was described by the Cantonese as: "No war, no peace, no defense, no death, no surrender, no departure." "Not fighting with the British, not negotiating, not defending the city, not committing suicide and martyrdom, not surrendering to the British, not fleeing, is just stupid where to wait for the British to play enough to withdraw."
This theory of Gandhi is simply first-rate, and it can be regarded as a simplified version of Gandhi's non-violent non-cooperation, and the history is distorted and even doubts whether Ye Mingchen left any works during his time in Calcutta, India, and was picked up by Gandhi as a standard.
Despite this, Ye Mingchen boasted that he was a Su Wu on the sea, and finally died of hunger strike without eating the grain of the British, and his behavior did not yield any benefits, the British did not understand, the Manchu Qing at that time regarded him as the culprit of the disaster to the country and the people, and degraded him to a sinner, and later after the Manchu Qing, the revolutionaries deliberately scandalized him as a scapegoat for the Manchu Qing, and until now he was still a completely negative image, simply a typical example of traitor.
Similar theories and different endings can only be said to be different from their own national conditions.