Text/Editor: Dream Pen,
Preface
Recently, a case suspected of illegal business operation was retried in a local court in Qinghai Province, but during the retrial, a judge was accused of "remote control" to direct the trial, and it was also through a WeChat group to direct the trial in real time. This seemingly unbelievable situation was exposed after the defender secretly filmed the chat records of the judge's WeChat group, and the chat records clearly showed that the court president and the president of the superior unit were directing the trial in the WeChat group.
Watch the video first:
Loading...
Video source: New Yellow River
As soon as such a situation was exposed, it immediately aroused widespread attention and heated discussions in public opinion, and many people expressed doubts and dissatisfaction with this matter, believing that such a court procedure was suspected of interference and unfairness, and at the same time, they also questioned the defender's behavior of secretly taking chat records, believing that his behavior had violated the court order and was even suspected of interfering with litigation activities. And how did the official respond to the judge's WeChat group directing the case?
1. The judge's WeChat group remotely controlled the trial, and the chat records were exposed
Recently, a major illegal business case was retried in a local court in Qinghai Province, but in the course of the trial, something unbelievable happened, and a judge was accused of "remote control" to direct the trial, and it was through a WeChat group in real time. This situation was first discovered at the scene of the trial, and was disclosed by the lawyer at the scene, when the lawyer shouted at the scene, saying that he heard the judge's mobile phone WeChat message prompt, and then the judge began to change his attitude towards the trial, which made everyone present feel very shocked and angry.
The lawyer's cry also immediately attracted the attention of other lawyers present, who went to check and finally found a shocking scene, it turned out that the judge was indeed in the process of the trial, receiving other people's messages in real time through the WeChat group, and immediately changed his attitude towards the trial after receiving the news, which made everyone shocked and angry, because there is a very big suspicion of unfairness in such a trial procedure, and it also seriously violates the procedural rights of the parties.
Moreover, once such a situation was exposed, it immediately caused a very big sensation in society, and many people expressed great concern and heated discussions on this matter, believing that there were very big problems in such court proceedings, and also questioned the impartiality of the courts, feeling that such court proceedings seriously violated the principle that judges should exercise judicial power independently, and also caused great harm to the parties, and it was necessary to arouse the attention of relevant departments and thoroughly investigate.
2. The defender secretly filmed the chat records, and the judge involved was accused of remote control of the trial
When such a situation was exposed, many people expressed great concern and heated discussion about this matter, and also questioned the judge's behavior of remote control of the trial, believing that such an act seriously violated the principle of openness and fairness of the trial procedure, and was also a serious infringement of the procedural rights of the parties, and it was necessary for the relevant departments to intervene in the investigation as soon as possible and seriously deal with the judges involved.
In this case, one of the defender's lawyers made some special moves, he secretly filmed the chat records of the judge's WeChat group through his mobile phone, and posted the recorded chat records on the Internet, so that more people could see the content of the chat records.
In these chat records, it is clearly shown that the president of the court and the president of the superior unit conducted real-time command in the WeChat group, and made specific arrangements and requirements for all aspects of the trial, and the judge also quickly changed his attitude towards the trial after receiving the news.
Moreover, once such chat records are exposed, public opinion will also discuss this matter more and more, and many people's attitude towards this matter is becoming more and more resolute, believing that there is indeed a very big suspicion of unfairness in such a court procedure, and also raising serious questions about the relevant judges and leaders, hoping to thoroughly investigate the truth of this matter and seriously deal with the violations of law and discipline.
3. Official response
In the face of the high attention and heated discussion of public opinion, but also serious questions about this matter, the relevant departments also quickly responded, they said that they have attached great importance to this matter, and have launched an investigation into this matter, Xiquan can find out the truth of the whole incident as soon as possible, and will also deal with it accordingly according to the results of the investigation.
At a time when everyone was very concerned about the results of the investigation and handling of this matter, the relevant departments also issued an official notice to the outside world, making some explanations and explanations for the entire incident.
In the official report, they admitted the fact that the judge received messages through the WeChat group during the trial and changed the attitude of the trial, and also expressed a serious attitude towards this, and said that the relevant judges would be dealt with accordingly.
However, in the circular, they also gave a certain explanation of the judge's behavior, saying that his behavior was carried out under the guidance of his superiors, and it was also to better implement the opinions and requirements of his superiors.
Fourth, write to the end
1. The judge's WeChat group remote control of the trial seriously violates the principle of openness and fairness of the trial procedure, and is also a serious infringement of the parties' procedural rights, and it is necessary for the relevant departments to conduct a thorough investigation of this matter and seriously deal with the violations of law and discipline.
2. Although the defender's actions may be illegal to a certain extent, their actions are also to let more people know the true situation of the case, and also indirectly promote the investigation and handling of the matter, and the relevant departments should also consider it comprehensively when handling the matter.
3. In future work, the relevant departments need to deeply reflect on this matter, and also need to draw lessons from it, strengthen the supervision and management of judicial work, and establish a more strict and standardized work system to ensure that similar incidents will not happen again.
Is #青海法官 "curtain hearing" compliant##青海法官 is "curtain hearing" compliant#
Note: The content of this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete