A question that can be answered in several ways, this time in China is unusual
1. No comment
Mingzhe protects himself, and no one touches this melon again. Then China and the United States formed a tacit understanding that the well water does not interfere with the river water;
2. Inconvenient permeability
Ambiguous, seemingly nothing, I replied, I took the initiative, and waited until it was convenient to talk about it. gave Lao Mei a bottom and saved some face, but the initiative was in hand;
3 Putting aside the above two diplomatic languages, scientists come forward and use the language of scientists, and the scientific spirit behind this language has one thing to say:
Not really.
Objective!
The Chinese attacked, the Americans defended.
1. In the aerospace sector: to tell the truth, is it hard?
2. But with the virtue of the Americans: even if it is fake, can it be admitted?
To attack, it is necessary to attack unprepared
What is the "unpreparedness" of the United States?
Boeing's manned spacecraft, temporarily canceled;
Because of one of the parts above, the factory that made this part is gone;
I found a replacement temporarily, and then I couldn't bear enough pressure in the general contract, and it was cold.
For example, make a plate of pot-wrapped meat, the buttocks are gone, the tenderloin is not burnt, the chicken is not crispy, and then the guests are waiting to eat, and the boss relies on this to make money, scenery, and brag about the signature dish!
The United States, how much does it need a loud satellite into the sky?
1. To go to this body's bad luck?
2. Make up for the deficit over the years?
3. Boost lost confidence?
What does a part say?
Losing a hatch in flight, repairing a lot of spare parts, upgrading without the support of backup technology, Boeing is in decline, what about the United States?
Regarding the hollowing out of the U.S. manufacturing industry brought about by a part, the economic transformation from real to virtual, and the proposition that aerospace science and technology can best reflect the country's technological strength: where did the original indispensable?
1. Prevent China from entering the space sector;
2. Legislate to prohibit China from getting involved in this area;
3. Start a space race with the USSR, which believed that the USSR was true, and the American Star Wars program was fake from beginning to end.
And then the fake drama is really done-
1. Sanction Huawei again;
2. Increase tariffs on Chinese steel by 300%;
3. Increase tariffs on new energy vehicles, batteries, and photovoltaic products by 25%-100% in China.
What do you mean?
The frontal attack can't be beaten, and it can only be stabbed in the back
The USSR was lame, because the USSR was prone to fooling.
Take down the second few old people such as Britain, Japan, Germany, and the Soviet Union, because these old people really can't become the first.
It is also a trade war, a technology war, and a financial war staged in turn, and for all competitors, it is just a little capable, relying on the status of the boss.
Position!
"Speak to China from a position of strength"!
The words are still being spoken, but the status is gone, but the strength is poor-
1. Aerospace, China is overwhelmed;
2. Scientific and technological innovation, China is unstoppable;
3. Financial reform, China's momentum is sinking.
Those who are good at fighting, seek to be in power!
Is the U.S. finally thinking of cutting interest rates?
1. Foreign capital can control small and medium-sized banks in China;
2. China's sale of over-the-counter treasury bonds.
Combining internal and external, dynamic and static cooperation, taking into account both far and near, and in terms of fighting financial wars, China is the ancestor.
Build a financial empire and then harvest the world?
With this economic foundation, can it support the aerospace dream of a big country? Still insisting that it's true?
I'm sorry, you take your Yangguan Road, and I take my single-plank bridge.
You climb yours, I climb mine, just as the Americans say, China and the United States climb two moons.
However, in this world, what has never been done is that without labor, production, and manufacturing, relying on "financial services" such as money printing, stock speculation, insurance, and lending, it can maintain the world's first!
The Chinese people call this "play ticket".
Yes is, no is not - pragmatism: offense is the best defense;
If there is, there will be no - industry: both offensive and defensive, the secret of attacking and retreating is not as good as oneself.
The "plan" of attacking and plotting, and the "world" of plotting for a while is not as good as seeking a lifetime, is the worldview:
Materialistic? Or is it idealism?
Work? Or play tickets?
The last "attack" of the siege is sanctions, tariffs, small courtyard walls, and kicking out Swift?
Let's make the moon landing clear?
Why don't you take a look at it again?