Recently, the resignation of Ren Yuechao, Huawei's high-value HR, has once again attracted attention. Ren Yuechao was once Huawei's proud recruitment killer, and he attracted many job-seeking young people to Huawei's big family with his handsome appearance and professional and calm image, which undoubtedly brought great help to the company's talents. But at the time of popularity, Ren Yuechao suddenly broke the news of his resignation, which caused widespread discussion inside and outside the company.
Loading...
Subsequently, Ren Yuechao's use of an Apple mobile phone made netizens hotly discussed. As a Huawei executive, Mr. Ren's use of a competitor's product is questionable. From the perspective of brand loyalty, Ren Yuechao's actions are bound to damage Huawei's image, and from the perspective of professional ethics, it also seems to be inconsistent with the status of an executive. However, there is a different view of everything.
From the point of view of the right of individual choice
Everyone has their own right to choose in life and work. Whether you choose to leave your job or choose which brand of phone to use, these are all personal freedoms. As an employee, the company expects employees to support its own brand, but that doesn't mean you can't use other brands. Just like we can't hold a phone accountable for its professional ethics just because we use it.
Ren Yuechao chose to be a live broadcaster after leaving his job, which may be more in line with his personal hobbies and interests. We can't criticize him too much for his choice, nor can we judge him with a double standard. Everyone should have the right to have basic choices about employment and life.
From the point of view of company policy and personal philosophy
When Ren Yuechao explained the reason for his resignation, he said that some company policies were not in line with his personal philosophy. Here we have to guess whether Huawei has some problems in human resource management or employee development, which limits Ren Yuechao's performance.
At the same time, it is inevitable that there will be some deficiencies in any enterprise, and employees should improve them with a constructive attitude, rather than leaving directly. Whether Ren Yuechao has tried to communicate internally and improve this point has not yet been explained.
From the perspective of business model changes
At present, live streaming as a new business model is increasingly emerging, which is consistent with Ren Yuechao earning a livelihood as a live broadcast host. It is not so much that he "jumped ship", but that he made a career adjustment following the trend of the times.
It is also important for the company to maintain a balance between the corporate philosophy and the personal development of its employees. Ren Yuechao's resignation does not necessarily mean disloyalty, which needs to be judged from more angles.
From the perspective of the influence of public opinion
The words and actions of any public figure will spark a lot of discussion. However, public opinion should not overestimate the individual's side of the story, nor should it be the basis for conclusions. For Ren Yuechao's use of Apple, we should not assume too much about his brand loyalty. Until the specifics are known, it is clearly more appropriate to give justice and understanding.
We do not intend to blame Ren Yuechao's choice, but understanding and analyzing it from a multi-faceted perspective will also help the public form a more comprehensive judgment on this incident. Personal life planning is complex, and we should not demonize others too much or settle for one.
We need to look at this incident in a fair, comprehensive and tolerant manner. Personal choice is fundamental, and it is not wise to blame others too much. There is a reason for different perspectives here, and the most important thing is to listen to different voices with an open and inclusive mind.
At last
As a public figure, Ren Yuechao's every choice and behavior will cause widespread discussion, which to a certain extent also urges each of us citizens to take on a higher sense of social responsibility.
For Ren Yuechao himself, we can't judge his inner fate and true thoughts. But no matter what path he chooses in the future, we wish him every step of the way.
For Huawei, we would like to see it continuously optimize its management policies and pay attention to the balanced growth of its employees to ensure that every employee can reach their maximum potential. Only in this way can the corporate culture and core competitiveness be improved in the long and lasting way.
Finally, as far as the Ren Yuechao incident itself is concerned, perhaps we should treat it with a more tolerant, understanding and tolerant attitude. Every choice is extremely complex, and judging a person or an event requires long-term observation from multiple perspectives, rather than simply staying on the surface. This may be a lesson worth pondering.