On the evening of April 27, a video attracted widespread attention on the Internet. The video content is a confrontation between the owner and the security guard at the entrance of a residential area. The owner said that his child had a high fever and wanted to be sent to the hospital, but the security guard did not let him enter the community.
Loading...
After a closer look, we learned the full picture of the incident. The community is located in Longhua District, Haikou City, on the night of the incident, the child had a high fever that did not go away, and the father drove to pick up the child to the hospital. However, the security guard did not open the door and did not let him go, which led to an argument and a physical altercation between the two parties.
After the incident, the police quickly arrived to deal with it. The police pointed out that the health of the child should be the first priority, and the owner should first send the child to the hospital. But the security guard didn't give up at the time, which was very surprising. Subsequently, witnesses later recalled that the owner was very emotional at that time, but he did not take a heavy hand and behaved relatively restrained.
The fuse of this incident was the brutal obstruction of the security guards, but we have to think about whether there are other internal reasons? A person familiar with the matter revealed that the property owner said that the owner had parked overnight in the community many times before, affecting other owners, so he had been included in the "blacklist" of the community. It is also reminiscent of the fact that security guards may take a tough stance in order to enforce "blacklisted" policing.
On closer inspection, there are many aspects to the matter itself. The first is that the security law enforcement is too arbitrary and does not give sufficient understanding to the emotions of children with high fever and parents; second, property management needs more humane care and should not be too absolute; third, the owner is not without impropriety before, and needs to self-examine whether he is also negligent. As all three parties have imperfections, it seems too arbitrary to accuse each other with prejudice.
The fundamental problem is that the management of public security in our communities needs to be sound and humane. In terms of management, more reasonable regulations should be formulated, and security law enforcement should also pay attention to flexible compromises in positions. As a part of the property with a wide range of contacts, security guards should learn more about communication theory and psychology, and master how to resolve entanglements through negotiation and communication.
Netizens are hotly discussed
Netizens said: His car was blocking the road in the community, he couldn't be contacted, other people in the community were in an emergency, who was responsible, he knew that his child had a fever and was anxious, and he parked the car.
Netizens said: Human life is at stake, and this security guard is tendoned. The first thing is for children to see a doctor, and other problems can be solved through negotiation.
Netizens said: Why do we set rules for the owners of the property? We paid for the shared area, and the things we bought with real money let the property be used as a gimmick to set rules?
Netizens said: This person who sent the child reaped the consequences! Being a man should abide by the rules! Of course, the security guard was a little wrong and insisted on principles too much!
Netizens said: The security behavior is really wrong, and it is important to save lives.
Write at the end
This incident also reminds us that community policing management requires the participation of multiple parties. On the one hand, residents should abide by the rules of the community, and on the other hand, the property should also treat different situations with a rational and humane attitude. As a public authority, the police should also uphold the principles of impartiality and neutrality. Only when all parties are responsible and weigh right and wrong can we find a balance and accountability.
After all, the dispute was over a sick child who was sent to the hospital. We hope that in the future, similar situations can be resolved through peaceful negotiations, and that success or failure will no longer be determined by the subjective judgment of a law enforcer or administrator. It is also hoped that all parties in the community can have in-depth conversations, cultivate mutual understanding and tolerance, and jointly create a harmonious community environment. It is only through multi-party cooperation and communication that our society can better protect the rights of individuals while taking into account the public interest.
What do you think about this matter? Welcome to leave a message in the comment area to discuss.