#头条创作挑战赛#
Before reading this article, I would like you to click "Follow", which is not only convenient for you to discuss and share, but also can bring you a different sense of participation, thank you for your support!
Three bowls are not bowls
Edit | Three bowls are not bowled
When driving out, my family always has to tell me repeatedly: "Slow down on the road, slow down on the road". How many people take this sentence as nagging?
Recently, on the highway in Yuncheng, Shanxi, a Wenjie M7 and a sprinkler truck were rear-ended, resulting in the death of two large and one small three people in the car.
What's more, it is said that all three of them were burned alive, and the scene was simply shocking!
The family members of the parties spoke out bitterly on the Internet: their husbands, younger brothers and sons are all scorched!
This makes the families of the parties how to face the reality!
The scene of the accident
The accident occurred at 3 p.m. on the 26th, according to the victim's family: it was her husband and younger brother who came to pick her up with their children that day, and they had a rear-end collision with a sprinkler truck on the road, in addition, she emphasized that the vehicle was only 3 months old, with automatic deceleration, and the airbag did not deploy when the accident occurred.
From the video taken at the scene, we can see that a raging fire has burned at the front of the car, and the people present broke the windows of the car to try to rescue, but failed to pull the people out of the car.
After the accident, there were multiple responses
First of all, the question world declares that the speed of the vehicle at the time of the accident was 115KM/h, the airbag was opened normally (which is contrary to the statement of the victim's family), and the characteristics of the power battery pack were normal.
In addition, according to the owner's family, many people thought of one of the promotional points when the M7 was first sold: Huawei's high-end intelligent driving assistance system.
So why didn't this car have intelligent recognition to avoid car accidents?
In response, the car company responded: The model of the incident is an entry-level rather than a smart driving version.
You know,WenjieM7Intelligent driving version is equipped with Huawei's intelligent driving assistance system,According to Wenjie's response,The car where the incident occurred is the Wenjie M7Plus version,Using the Bosch solution。
Bosch has denied the claims
In response to the question's statement, Bosch followed up with a statement: After investigation, the vehicle involved was not equipped with the Bosch Intelligent Driving System (including AEB).
The two sides insist on their own words, and there is still no definite answer to whose system the car was carrying.
In addition, there is also a point of widespread concern about the fact that the doors did not automatically unlock after the accident.
From the video taken at the rescue scene, it can be seen that the rescuers smashed the windows of the car and tried to pull people out of the car, which shows that the car door could not be opened at that time.
Nowadays, many vehicles will automatically lock during driving, and because there are child passengers in the car, there is a high probability that it is locked in the car.
It is common sense that even if the vehicle is locked, it should be automatically unlocked in the event of a collision.
The customer service who asked the world also responded to this question: most vehicles now do not have an automatic unlocking function.
Then the problem comes again, in the owner's manual of the M7, we can clearly see the "emergency automatic unlocking" part of the content.
There is a sentence that says, "The vehicle has collided, and the system has received a collision signal", and the prompt section also states that it will not unlock automatically in some cases.
So we can also think that the collision of the vehicle involved in the accident was not clearly identified by the system as a collision signal, so the automatic unlocking function was not triggered, and there was obviously a problem with the response of this customer service.
In addition, we also noticed that there was no problem with the car being in the fast lane of the highway at the time of the accident, but the car must have been the main responsibility after the rear-end collision.
But why is there a sprinkler truck on the fast lane, and is it driving normally or is it in operation? The direct cause and responsibility of the accident still need to wait for the investigation of the traffic police department.
epilogue
Finally, I would like to say that no matter where the responsibility lies, the lives of the deceased cannot be recovered, which is a painful fact.
I really hope that such a tragedy will not happen again!
I don't know what you think about this?Welcome to leave your thoughts in the comment area below, if you like the article, remember to like and follow us, see you next time.
[Disclaimer] The time, process, and pictures of the article are all from the Internet, and the article aims to spread positive energy, and there is no vulgar and other bad guidance. The audience should look at this incident rationally, and do not leave malicious comments with subjective assumptions, the Internet is not a place outside the law. If there is a dispute about the authenticity of this article, copyright or image infringement, please contact the author in time, and we will delete it.