The ebb and flow of non-staff personnel is like an autumn wind sweeping away leaves, which is both cold and ruthless. However, when these "invisible people" really left, we found that they had already become indispensable screws in the system.
Looking back on the past, the emergence of non-staff personnel is like Pandora's box being opened, and it is out of control. They may not have the aura of formal organization, but they do a lot of work in silence. Now, the finances are tight, and a storm of retreat is sweeping, and these non-staff personnel are like candles in the wind, which may be extinguished at any time.
However, the removal process has encountered unprecedented resistance. First and foremost is the issue of work stoppage. As the saying goes, "if the skin does not exist, the hair will be attached", the departure of non-staff personnel has brought many jobs into a deadlock. In the face of the sudden burden of work, the employees of the formal establishment have put on a posture of "inadequate". It's not that they don't want to take over, but they don't know where to start, after all, these jobs have long been familiar and mastered by non-staff personnel.
In addition, the non-staff personnel themselves have developed strong resistance to the dismissal work. They have paid their youth and sweat for the unit, but now they are facing the dilemma of being swept away. They demanded a reasonable explanation from the unit, but there was only an order to requit and no substantial compensation. This unfair treatment has made the non-staff staff feel chilled and disappointed.
The work of removing non-staff personnel is not only a matter of personnel adjustment, but also involves deep-seated contradictions in the system and mechanism. On the one hand, the problem of redundancy is serious, and the use of formal staffing is not efficient; On the other hand, the existing establishment cannot meet the actual work needs, so it can only rely on non-staff forces. The existence of such contradictions has made the work of removing non-staff personnel extremely complicated and thorny.
At the same time, we must also see the trend of changing government functions behind the dismissal of non-staff personnel. With the continuous advancement of streamlining administration and delegating powers, government departments are withdrawing from specific affairs and devoting more energy to macroeconomic management and public services. This transformation is the general trend, but it also brings unprecedented challenges to non-staff personnel.
In this storm of retreat, we can't help but ask: where will these non-staff personnel go? How will their livelihoods and development be secured? As a member of society, we cannot turn a blind eye to their plight. We should adhere to the principle of putting people first, provide necessary employment guidance and transitional support for non-staff personnel, and help them get out of their predicament and achieve new development as soon as possible.
In this storm of retreat, we have also seen some problems and contradictions within the system. We should take this as an opportunity to further deepen reform, optimize the allocation of human resources, and improve the efficiency of employing people. Only in this way can we make the system healthier and more efficient.
Readers, what are your thoughts and opinions on this matter? Welcome to leave a message in the comment area to discuss.