Before reading this article, I sincerely invite you to click "Follow", which is not only convenient for you to discuss and share, but also brings you a different sense of participation, and it is more convenient to come back at any time to read more exciting content, thank you for your support.
Not long ago, Palestine wanted to join the United Nations. However, the United States, with its right to veto certain decisions with one vote, directly contained this Palestinian request.
This move by the United States has also caused protests from many countries, knowing that in this resolution, 12 countries have already supported Palestine's accession to the United Nations.
Seeing that Palestine has successfully joined the United Nations, the United States has taken the initiative to stand up and raise objections. Relying on its status as a permanent member of the UN Security Council, the United States directly threw out a veto.
When I saw this, I believe that many people do not understand the right of veto, what does it mean?
The veto is actually a right possessed by the permanent members of the UN Security Council.
This organizational structure was established as an international organization after the end of the Second World War to promote stability in the international order.
Once there is a military conflict or a political disagreement, it is necessary to use the functions of the UN Security Council to resolve the military conflict and political disagreement.
The United States was the final winner of World War II, and the framework of the United Nations was created by the United States, and the emergence of this organization posed a great challenge to the League of Nations, which had previously been linked and led by the United Kingdom.
In fact, the international alliance led by Britain is also aimed at protecting the interests of some major powers, and once certain interests are involved, if other countries cannot meet the interests of the big powers, then the opposing countries will be coerced.
In order to prevent this phenomenon from continuing to happen, after the end of World War II, the United States put forward the idea of establishing a United Nations to avoid the embarrassing impact of the withdrawal of major powers on international organizations.
At the same time, the United States has ensured the functioning of the organization by giving significant power to other countries. It was on this basis that the corresponding competence of the United Nations was established.
In fact, the United States established this organization to safeguard its interests.
In the face of dramatic changes in the global landscape, there is also increasing inequality in the United Nations system.
The veto is a very typical problem, and this right is being abused by the United States again and again.
When some permanent members of the United States want to suppress other countries, they only need to rely on the right of veto to directly deny the requests of some small countries, and there is no guarantee of fairness in the UN Security Council.
In fact, many years ago, the Pakistani side made a request to join the United Nations.
But at that time, the United States rejected the resolution with a veto in hand. Now, the Palestinians have applied again, and it is the same US veto that has prevented Palestine from joining the United Nations.
In addition to this, the United States has abused this right to allow the war in the Desert Strip to come to an end.
In the context of the continued attacks on the Gaza Strip, the Security Council has called for a ceasefire, but has repeatedly rejected the United States.
While the majority of the Security Council countries support a ceasefire in Gaza, the United States has used its veto power to not only reject the proposals of many Security Council countries, but also continue to promote the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.
Recently, China has made strong demands on the United States' insistent practice of making a statement.
It is understood that at the meeting of the International Monetary Fund, the head of the mainland banking institution said that the United States has now successfully taken control of this organization, resulting in the inability of the organization to truly play its functions.
In order to prevent the United States from continuing to interfere in the actions proposed by the organization in a one-lining-and-the-ordinary manner. This organization should be reformed to prevent it from becoming a puppet of the United States.
In fact, the organization was established to maintain the stability of the global exchange rate and eliminate the chaos of the international economic order.
At present, the organization has existed for many years and has played a very active role in the process of global economic development, but with the continuous advancement of global integrated economic development, the organization has also upgraded and adjusted its role.
However, in recent years, the IMF has become more and more Americanized, and even has a large amount of real power controlled by the United States.
Although the organization has been responsible for stabilizing the fixed exchange rate and ensuring the stability of the international exchange rate for decades, it has also supervised the economic policies of various countries and the exchange rate policies they have implemented, and has been able to provide strong assistance to the financial development of various countries in a short period of time.
After many years of operation, the organization has become a very important institution in the field of the global economy.
But now the organization is becoming a tool of the United States and has lost the essence of its original existence.
In particular, the veto power allows those countries with a relatively large stake to always say nothing about the interests of other countries.
In response to this situation, China has put forward a demand for the reform of the organization, which may be effective in preventing the organization from being controlled by the United States.
What do you think about reforming the IMF?