Bai Jingting sued the UP master, where is the bottom line of public figures, and the public opinion front is opposed?
Recently, actor Bai Jingting complained to station B and asked to delete the relevant videos because he was dissatisfied with the comments and editing of his performance in the variety show "Chunshan Learning" by some UP masters on station B, and also asked to punish those UP masters. The move sparked widespread controversy and discussion online, with some arguing that Bai Jingting's glass heart was too heavy, while others supported him to protect his reputation. The two sides are facing each other, and the focus of the debate is on how much public figures should be able to bear and the boundary of freedom of speech in the media.
This matter involves many levels such as public figures, self-media, and freedom of speech, so let's look at it from different angles. First of all, from Bai Jingting's point of view, as an actor who has worked hard in the entertainment industry for many years, he has put in too much effort, of course, he hopes that his image will not be distorted. Those UP masters made exaggerated clips and comments about his performance on the show, which could leave the wrong impression on the audience and affect his career.
On the other hand, as a public figure, Bai Jingting will naturally receive more attention and comments. Everyone has the right to express their opinions on his every move, which is the embodiment of freedom of speech in the era of self-media. As long as it does not involve personal attacks and rumor-mongering, some comments that seem "excessive" are also acceptable. Celebrities are put in the spotlight and judged by others.
Personally, I believe that the freedom of speech of self-media also has a bottom line, and it cannot be completely unscrupulous. If Lord UP's remarks have seriously affected Bai Jingting's reputation and life, then it is necessary to stop it. Everyone deserves basic human dignity, even celebrities. We should look at this issue with reason and empathy, rather than blindly pointing the finger at either side.
From Bilibili's point of view, as a video-sharing platform, it needs to seek a balance between freedom of speech and maintaining order. On the one hand, it should respect the creative freedom of UP owners, and on the other hand, it should also protect the legitimate rights and interests of celebrities and prevent the platform from becoming a place for rumors and slander. Bilibili needs to review the video content in accordance with certain rules, and delete or warn the videos that do have problems.
There is no right or wrong in this matter, and we need to look at it comprehensively and objectively. As ordinary netizens, we can express our opinions online, but also respect the facts and others. As for the contradiction between Bai Jingting and the UP master, it still needs to be resolved through legal means in the end. We will wait and see, and we hope that the two sides can engage in rational dialogue and reconcile and end disputes.
This incident has once again sparked heated discussions on the topic of free speech. Some people believe that in the era of self-media, everyone has the right to speak out and should not be deprived by any person or institution. As long as it is not illegal, everyone should respect the existence of different voices.
Differing views were also raised. They believe that freedom of speech is not absolute, and must have a bottom line and boundaries. If the speech has seriously harmed the rights and interests of others or the social order, it should be punished accordingly. Rights are built on responsibility, and the abuse of freedom of expression is irresponsible.
It is undeniable that the rise of self-media has given ordinary people more opportunities to express themselves. But it also brings some chaos, such as rumors, personal attacks, vulgar content, and so on. How to protect freedom of speech to the greatest extent and curb these inappropriate speech has become a difficult problem to be solved urgently.
From this point of view, Bai Jingting's practice of suing the UP master may be a reference. It sends a message to us that even ordinary netizens cannot ignore basic human rights such as the right to reputation, let alone wantonly harm others. Everyone should think twice before exercising their freedom of expression and assume the corresponding legal and moral responsibility.
As a public figure, Bai Jingting's own ability to bear it should be stronger. Blindly resolving contradictions through legal means is inevitably a bit of a fuss. His approach this time may also be a weighed choice, in order to serve as a wake-up call to those who wantonly slander.
This incident reflects a difficult problem for public figures to protect their rights and interests in the era of self-media. On the one hand, they need to be subject to public scrutiny and commentary, and on the other hand, they must not allow abuse and rumour-mongering to run rampant. As ordinary netizens, we should also think twice before making statements, and respect the facts and others.
For the platforms, they need to strike a balance between freedom of expression and maintaining order. It can't be completely laissez-faire, and it can't be overly censored. Perhaps we can learn from the practices of some mature platforms, such as setting up a reporting mechanism and formulating speech guidelines, so that everyone can express themselves in a relatively civilized and orderly environment.
This incident has also triggered people's reflection on the ecology of the entertainment industry. Many people believe that celebrities rely too much on traffic, and traffic is too dependent on various scandals and negative news. This deformed ecology has led to the confrontation between celebrities and netizens, and both sides have unshirkable responsibilities.
In the long run, we need to change this unhealthy ecology. Celebrities should win the public's affection through excellent works and good character, rather than relying on negative news, and netizens should also look at celebrities with reason and empathy, rather than demonizing them. Only by working together can we create a relatively harmonious entertainment environment.
There is no right or wrong in this matter, and we need to look at it comprehensively and objectively. As ordinary netizens, we can express our opinions online, but also respect the facts and others. As for the contradiction between Bai Jingting and the UP master, it still needs to be resolved through legal means in the end. We will wait and see, and we hope that the two sides can engage in rational dialogue and reconcile and end disputes.