With the reversal of the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, Ukraine has fallen into an irreversible predicament, and the support of the United States and the West for Ukraine is far less than that of a period of time after the start of the military operation.
A few days ago, during his visit to China, the US Treasury Secretary claimed that China was encouraging Russia's war behavior, and after Blinken decided to visit China, he brought the issue to the table and slandered China for providing Russia with a large amount of weapons and equipment.
In order to make himself more confident, he even pulled in the G7 alliance to cheer him on, so what happened in the past few days? What choice will the mainland make?
G7 gives you one of the two options
Prior to Blinken's announcement of his visit to China, he had been in fairly frequent contact with Western organizations such as NATO and the European Union in Europe, and he spared no effort in slandering China at these meetings, claiming that China was "militarily aiding" Russia, and even using "worrying scales".
The reason why they say this is nothing more than the old old American cliché -- the "China threat theory", they have been preaching all over the world how China is and how it is threatening, and the big guys must unite together and cannot be taken the initiative by China.
This set can only be said to be useful, but not much, many third world countries can naturally distinguish who is the country that is sincere in their equal dealings, and the Western world has many ties with China, no matter how much it is promoted.
If the United States does not block Europe from interacting with China, believe it or not, a large number of European countries will immediately increase their trade with China?
However, people have to bow their heads under the roof, and most of the members of the G7 organization do not want to be enemies of the United States even if they know what the situation is, and besides, they are really afraid that Russia will win in Ukraine, and it will be of great benefit to them to be able to sow discord between China and Russia.
If Russia defeats Ukraine, which direction will they develop? Don't think about it, it must be Europe, after all, their Far East has only just started in the past two years, and there has not been a particularly big improvement.
And this, naturally, will arouse the vigilance of European countries, they do not want to see a Russia bordering them, let alone a strong Russia, all things considered, it is more cost-effective to follow the United States to suppress China and Russia.
In the G7 organization, four European countries, then one United States, one Japan, and one Canada, you can roughly guess their choice by looking at the composition of these countries.
On the 19th, after the G7 meeting, they issued a joint statement and gave China a choice between two choices: either follow the G7 and reduce trade with Russia, or be jointly sanctioned by the G7 countries.
China's response
The mainland's response to this was very simple and very direct, and it directly sent a special plane to Russia to discuss matters, and Comrade Chen Wenqing, secretary of the Central Political and Legal Affairs Commission, set foot on Russian soil and began a nine-day visit.
In my opinion, the G7's so-called joint sanctions are just a scene, and the three countries of Europe, France, Germany and Italy, although they have followed the United States to announce a lot of sanctions against China, have basically not made any splashes in China.
In other words, the sanctions imposed by France, Germany, and Italy may be very perfunctory, and if you follow the United States in some areas that are not particularly important, you really plan to make your buddies fall out with China? Do you want to see who the EU's largest trading partner is? Who will make up for the lack of nutrition from China?
As for the United Kingdom and Canada, these two countries are extremely pro-American, so the sanctions against China have basically not been broken, and China's foreign trade with these two countries is not the largest.
For Yingga, you sanction you, I sanction mine, we don't delay each other, and we won't lose a piece of meat anyway.
On the other hand, Japan's largest trading partner is China, but China's largest trading partner is not Japan, so what does this mean? This means that if Japan wants to impose sanctions on China, it will inevitably encounter the same degree of countermeasures, and it is estimated that it will most likely be Japan that will not be able to resist it first.
Therefore, the mainland has the courage and capital to ignore the threat of the G7 and continue to engage with Russia, and the most important thing is that the trade between China and Russia is normal trade, and we are not afraid of shadows, so that we have no reason to echo the G7 and reduce exchanges with Russia.
It is impossible to cut with Russia
In today's general environment, the developed Western world led by the United States occupies the initiative on the scene, and as the two vanguards of the world's counter-hegemony, China and Russia have no need to cut off each other.
For example, if Russia chooses to back down and not use nuclear weapons in the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, and then declares the war lost, what will it lead to?
After the collapse of the Soviet Union, what treatment did it suffer from its former member states?
What did Ukraine look like just after its disintegration? The world's third largest military power, with countless nuclear weapons and advanced weapons and equipment, but its economy is a little rotten.
Then look at how far Ukraine has fallen after being deceived by the United States and the West? You don't really think that the "European womb" is praising them, right? Give up the weapons to defend the country in exchange for false economic development, and then become a pawn in the struggle between the United States and Russia step by step.
Well, if Russia fails, it will not end much better than Ukraine today, so Russia cannot fail, and after defeat it is a bottomless abyss.
Moreover, after Russia's defeat, he may become the next target of NATO's expansion, and after Russia is included in NATO, where will they put their artillery racks, it should be needless to say, right?
Moreover, Mongolia has long been pro-American, and if Russia falls into the hands of the United States, it will basically liberate Mongolia, as well as the five Central Asian countries.
In other words, if Russia fails and becomes a vassal of the United States, the United States is fully qualified to wrap its artillery racks around China's territory.
Therefore, even if it is for its own future, it is impossible for China to watch Russia fail, and to put it to an extreme, I would rather see Russia finally pull the United States to blow itself up than see Russia bow its head and admit it.
In today's world situation, China is very good, and the development prospects are very bright, and it is impossible to take the initiative to give up the current environment to cater to the United States and the West.
Resources:
"The G7 Threatens China: Closer to Russia, Far from the West" Observer.com
On the second anniversary of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, the G7 has once again pointed the finger at China