As we all know, Huawei has always had the position of "head" in the field of automotive intelligent driving. Not long ago, we also test-drove the newly upgraded Wenjie M7 equipped with ADS2.0, which was in the downtown area of Tianjin, and the functional performance of this car was quite good. Just today, the Great Wall also launched a live broadcast in Baoding, and Wei Jianjun, chairman of Great Wall Motors, also went down in person, driving his own Wei brand Blue Mountain, and tested his latest full-scene NOA function without high-precision maps in Baoding. So who is smarter in the Great Wall or Huawei's intelligent driving system?
As an audience who has experienced Huawei's no-map NCA function and watched the live broadcast of the Great Wall throughout the whole process, what are the differences between the intelligent driving systems of these two different car companies? Let's briefly analyze it.
First of all, Huawei's models with intelligent driving systems are equipped with a lidar, 3 millimeter-wave radars, 12 ultrasonic radars and 11 high-definition visual perception cameras;
In terms of hardware, there is not much difference in the configuration of the two.
Secondly, what about the actual performance?
In today's live broadcast, WEY brand Blue Mountain can accurately identify traffic lights, and can accurately distinguish between standard traffic lights and non-standard traffic lights, and the steering success rate at traffic light intersections is about 95%.
When we tested the M7 before, the car can also accurately identify the standard traffic lights at intersections, which is not much different from Huawei's intelligent driving system.
In addition, in the process of live broadcasting, Wei brand Blue Mountain's recognition of some construction walls, cone barrels, etc. is clear and accurate, and the recognition of pedestrians and non-motor vehicles is also relatively accurate; of course, because camera and radar recognition takes a certain amount of time, so it is not as fast as the driver's response; but it is worth mentioning that on Huawei's ADS 2.0, there are also such problems.
In the case of ADS 2.0, for example, it can recognize obstacles similar to pedestrians and vehicles, but it usually takes 3-5 seconds to react after braking. This is due to the limitations of the current hardware conditions, but in the same class, such a response speed is already considered fast.
At the same time, in today's live broadcast, one thing that impresses me is that the Great Wall's intelligent driving system is not as conservative as other intelligent driving systems, but reasonably speeds up within a reasonable time range. For example, in other models, the intelligent driving system will be relatively conservative and less intelligent.
For example, in today's live broadcast, WEY brand Blue Mountain can successfully complete rapid merging and following on congested roads, which not only effectively prevents congestion, but also reaches the destination at the fastest speed under the premise of ensuring road safety and complying with relevant laws and regulations.
Summary:
Judging from this live broadcast, the Great Wall's intelligent driving performance is still better than I imagined, and it is in the first echelon in China, and Wei Jianjun's live broadcast this time is bound to bring a wave of heat and traffic to the Great Wall.