I have to say that in the pit people, the United States and the United Kingdom really smell like each other. Australia wants to be the "little overlord" of the Asia-Pacific region, but it is being manipulated by the United States and Britain to the death, and keeps saying that they want to help Australia build nuclear submarines, in my opinion, they just want to throw "nuclear garbage" into the Asia-Pacific region and let Australia carry the "black pot".
The Americans and the British really have sinister intentions, and at the beginning they engaged in the "AUKUS" tripartite partnership in order to slowly expand until the Asia-Pacific version of the "mini-NATO" is formed.
In my opinion, what the US government wants is that Australia is not only a good ammunition depot, but also a good base for dealing with "nuclear contamination".
This is one of the links in the Asia-Pacific strategy of the United States, and to be honest, with the current situation of the United States, it is not yet known when the nuclear submarines promised Australia will be in place. The little military aid that is said to be given to Ukraine has been dragged left and right, and there is no one yet, the Ukrainian army is almost wiped out, and the Americans can't come up with anything decent to continue to aid Ukraine.
I think that on the one hand, the Americans feel that it is unnecessary, and on the other hand, it actually shows that the current United States is not so rich, after all, in the direction of the Middle East, it still needs to consider whether to give 18 billion dollars of weapons to Israel.
For the Americans, Australia is just a resting position for the US military, and Australia's careful thinking is not important to the United States at all.
Although after the "Aukus Alliance", Japan, Canada and other members may be included. However, judging from the current situation, the formal significance is greater than the practical significance, and the influence of "Aukus" mainly depends on whether the United States group can afford this situation.
As a matter of fact, the Europeans have already felt that the focus of the United States is to focus on the Asia-Pacific strategy. However, this also illustrates a problem: the United States cannot take into account multiple "battlefields" at the same time, and once the US policy begins to have a focus, those weak points should be dealt with, for example, in Africa, Niger is now going to drive out the US military, and the cooperation of the Americans in Africa in the future will only become more difficult; in the Middle East, too, it is not only Israel that does not listen to the United States, but Iraq, which was once bullied by the United States very badly, has also begun to harden up, and its civilian armed organizations have even threatened the US troops stationed in Iraq to get out of Iraq as soon as possible.
It can be seen from this that the United States is now paying too much attention to the Asia-Pacific region, and it is the "greatest ability" of the United States to take Britain with it and deceive its allies.
Originally, Japan's discharge of nuclear sewage into the sea has caused great trouble to the Pacific Ocean and nearby waters, and the countries surrounding Japan will not be able to avoid the impact, and if the nuclear waste of the United States and Britain is transported to Australia for "digestion," it will deal a heavy blow to the ecological environment of the Asia-Pacific region. The reason why the United States and Britain will transport nuclear waste to Australia is because there is no effective way to reduce nuclear pollution, and the transportation to a third country has a quick effect and low cost.
But what about sacrificing the health of the people in the Asia-Pacific region, and what about the human rights that are said to be good? If Australia becomes a "nuclear garbage dump," the countries in the Asia-Pacific region must not be afraid? Everyone is not having a good life, and we have to say that this move of the United States and Britain is really poisonous! But at the same time, it is estimated that their Asia-Pacific version of "mini-NATO" will be poisoned before it has yet to take shape.