Andy Lau's new film "Mr. Red Carpet" was criticized by CCTV by name, and his sharp words pierced the lungs of the film

This year's movie Spring Festival file can be described as surging, and blockbusters from all walks of life are competing for beauty.

Behind this prosperity, there is a movie "Mr. Red Carpet" that has caused an uproar due to the withdrawal of the file. CCTV even rarely stood up and criticized the filmmaker by name, with sharp words and straight punctures in the lungs.

Looking back on the Spring Festival file, "Mr. Red Carpet" was originally set at this time, intending to get a piece of the hot market.

However, in the face of the box office crushing of strong opponents such as "Hot and Hot" and "Flying Life 2", the film chose to withdraw. This behavior not only surprised the audience, but also made CCTV can't help but speak.

CCTV bluntly pointed out in the report that "Mr. Red Carpet" can't beat and run, which is already a trick.

As a blockbuster with a production budget of up to 260 million, the quality of the film is extremely incommensurate with its investment.

The red carpet scenes in the film may briefly catch the audience's eye, but the lack of depth and connotation of the storyline, as well as the rough production level, have left audiences disappointed.

CCTV's criticism is not groundless.

In fact, the Waterloo of "Mr. Red Carpet" in word-of-mouth has long been an indisputable fact.

The film's scores on major rating websites are dismal, and audience reviews mercilessly point out its shortcomings.

In this way, when the film company chose to withdraw, it may have foreseen its dismal performance in the market.

However, what is puzzling is that in the face of such an obvious market disadvantage, why did the filmmakers of "Mr. Red Carpet" insist on withdrawing?

What are the reasons and motivations behind this?

Some industry insiders believe that the withdrawal of "Mr. Red Carpet" may be due to a misjudgment of market positioning and excessive greed for the box office.

In such a competitive period as the Spring Festival, the film may not have enough confidence to compete head-on with other blockbusters.

And when the box office performance is not good, they choose the extreme measure of withdrawing, trying to escape the cruel competition in the market.

But withdrawing is not a good solution. On the contrary, it will only make the audience question the professionalism and integrity of the film's party even more.

As CCTV said, the film market is not a child's play, let alone a grass stage team.

The finalization and withdrawal of a movie should be deliberate and well-planned, not hasty like "Mr. Red Carpet".

Regarding the withdrawal of "Mr. Red Carpet", we can't help but ask: did the filmmakers really consider the audience's feelings when deciding to withdraw the file, and did they really respect the art form of film?

Or do they simply see film as a tool to make money, forgetting its true value as a cultural product?

In fact, the withdrawal of "Mr. Red Carpet" is not an isolated case.

This year's Spring Festival file alone, plus "Mr. Red Carpet", 4 movies have been withdrawn one after another.

In order to save strength, it is only necessary to fight again at a later date.

However, after the withdrawal of the movie, can there still be a spring when it is re-screened? Will the audience still pay for it?

In today's film market, some films do not hesitate to sacrifice quality and reputation in order to pursue box office and maximize profits.

They ignore the particularity and importance of film as a cultural product, and forget that the audience is the ultimate force that determines the success of a film.

The audience's eyes are bright, and the audience has their own judgment on the quality of a movie.

When the quality and word-of-mouth of a movie cannot be recognized by the audience, even if it has a high box office and no matter how much publicity it has, it will eventually be eliminated by the market.

The withdrawal of "Mr. Red Carpet" is a wake-up call for all film practitioners: the film market needs integrity and professionalism, and it needs to respect the audience and respect the arts.

Only those films that are truly made with heart, emotional people, and quality can stand out in the fierce market competition and win the love and respect of the audience.

I hope that in the future film market, we will be able to see more high-quality, professional works, instead of the sloppy "fast food culture" like "Mr. Red Carpet".

At the same time, it is also expected that CCTV and other media can continue to play the role of public opinion supervision and provide the audience with more true, objective and valuable film evaluation information.