Some people say that the end of the universe is live streaming, which seems to be true, when the number of fans reaches a certain level, live streaming seems to be inevitable. This law that is not a law has been fulfilled in Teacher Yao Yanyan.
Teacher Yao Yanyan, the female teacher who once reported the unfair evaluation of the school's professional title, was once known as a fighter for brave resistance and a hero in the teaching world, because of that report, her reputation rose and her fans skyrocketed.
After finally being rated as senior not long ago, Teacher Yao Yanyan finally fulfilled the law that is not a law and chose to live broadcast to bring goods. It is inevitable that this matter will cause controversy, because it gives people a contrast.
What contrast?
First, in the public perception, the image of a teacher should be pure-hearted and desireless, and some people feel that it is incongruous to draw on money in this way;
Second, in the perception of many people, teachers cannot engage in a second career, and live streaming gives people a feeling of going to the sea to do business;
Third, Teacher Yao Yanyan once claimed that her teacher's ethics and teaching style were award-winning, and in the public perception, teachers have good ethics and are usually focused on education and teaching.
Therefore, those who oppose Teacher Yao Yanyan's live broadcast believe that "justice is used and goodwill is harvested", that is, the previous support for her is to support justice and sympathize with her misfortune, not to support her current live broadcast.
However, those who support Teacher Yao Yanyan believe that it is understandable to make money legally, and teachers also have to support their families, and teachers are not saints, let alone use their spare time, why not?
In view of the contrast in the above three points of public perception, in fact, the words that support Teacher Yao Yanyan can be used as a refutation. It is understandable for teachers to use their spare time to earn extra money, although teachers refer to the management of civil servants, but live streaming is not yet a formal profession, and there is no contradiction between teacher ethics and earning extra money.
At present, there is no corresponding provision in the "Teachers Law" and the "Measures for Handling Violations of Professional Ethics by Primary and Secondary School Teachers" to restrict teachers' live streaming behavior, or there is no clear and specific clause prohibiting live streaming.
Article 11 of Article 4 of the "Measures for the Handling of Violations of Professional Ethics by Primary and Secondary School Teachers" is "other violations of professional ethics".
The last sentence of Article 4 of the "Ten Guidelines for the Professional Conduct of Primary and Secondary School Teachers in the New Era" "Concentrate on Teaching and Educating People" says:
It is not allowed to violate teaching discipline, perfunctory teaching, or engage in part-time and part-time salary behaviors that affect the work of education and teaching without authorization.
Compared with "live streaming", "live streaming" does not seem to be a "part-time salary", because "live streaming" is not a formal occupation in the first place. In addition, "live streaming" cannot be said to be a violation of teaching discipline, nor can it be said to affect education and teaching.
During the day, he concentrates on teaching and educating people, and at night he freely broadcasts live to bring goods.
This seems to be understandable. Therefore, if Teacher Yao Yanyan wants to find fault with the laws and regulations, she will definitely not be able to find fault with the live broadcast of the goods, otherwise she would not dare to do it blatantly.
It's just that this kind of thing always seems to have a bit of a feeling that isn't normal, which is essentially the same as the situation of the teacher delivering takeaways. I think that the education department must feel uncomfortable about this, and feel that it will damage the image of teachers. Of course, she didn't need it anymore.
However, although it is understandable for teachers to bring goods live streaming, it is impossible to say that there is no social impact. The key to this matter depends on how students and parents evaluate it. I don't believe her students and parents will be indifferent. I don't think it's likely that students and parents, especially parents, will approve of their children's teachers' livestreaming.
This question is easy to answer by thinking about it from another perspective. Your child's teacher brings goods live every night, what do you think? Even a more mature child may not have a positive evaluation.