For your better reading and interactive experience, in order for you to be able to see more content in time, click "Follow" and I will update more wonderful stories and share different wonderful moments for you every day
Text: Kendall Source Entertainment
Edited by Kendall Source Entertainment
At first glance, "Flowers" and Wong Kar-wai, a director with a unique style, seem to be a match made in heaven, but it unexpectedly attracted a wave of negative reviews. Li Liqun pointed out the flaws of the film in the comments, and pointed to the root of the problem.
CCTV also tried to save the scene with a strong appeal, but it didn't seem to work. Wong Kar-wai's bad review turmoil, whether it is the exaggeration of individual voices or deep-seated creative problems, has become the focus of heated discussions among fans.
In terms of the artistic conception of the film, Wong Kar-wai pursued a unique narrative style as always, but this attempt seems to have caused discomfort to the audience. Whether the idea pointed out by Li Liqun touches the essence of the film is thought-provoking.
The success of the film seems to be not only a director's personal achievement, but also a profound discussion about aesthetic concepts and the boundaries of literary and artistic creation.
What is the secret behind this bad review storm, and are there deeper reasons for the audience's doubts and criticisms?
After Wong Kar-wai's "Flowers" was launched, it caused a word-of-mouth turmoil. Luo Shancao unceremoniously made a sharp criticism of the work, including Shanghai's famous hosts and food in the scope of attack.
This turmoil is not only an evaluation of the TV series, but also a deep reflection on whether regional attacks are necessary in the comments and how to maintain objectivity and neutrality.
In this melting pot of cultures, should we avoid regional attacks becoming part of the commentary? Chinese culture has a long history, and each place has a rich history and unique traditions.
Regional attacks are not only likely to trigger negative emotions, but may also damage the diversity of Chinese culture. We call for respect and understanding of local characteristics, so that local cultures can become a unique part of the Chinese cultural family.
Luo Shancao's comments were fierce, directly criticizing Shanghai's famous hosts and food. Is it necessary for such offensive rhetoric to be part of the commentary?
In the richness of Chinese culture, each region has its own unique customs and culture, should we respect and understand each other's differences more?
Chinese culture is broad and profound, and regions should respect each other and jointly promote cultural prosperity. Through the example of artist Zhao Benshan, we can see that regional characteristics can be part of culture, rather than being the object of attack.
Only in an atmosphere of inclusiveness and respect can Chinese culture show its true diversity and unique charm on the world stage.
He pointed out that "Flowers" seems loose and lacks logic in the storyline, and the character creation is not deep enough. The overall narrative style of the film is vague and confusing, leaving viewers confused and disappointed.
This is not simply an art criticism, but also a question of the creator. Director Wong Kar-wai has always been an acclaimed film director, but he seems to have encountered some difficulties in the field of TV dramas.
Li Liqun believes that Wong Kar-wai's experience in directing TV dramas seems to be insufficient, and "Flowers" does not match the reality of Shanghai in his opinion, which is difficult to accept.
This view has caused heated discussions among the audience, and some people agree with Li Liqun's view that "Flowers" does not show the director's consistent artistic style and innovation.
They believe that it is the duty of an actor to perform the role carefully and not to evaluate the script and director too much. "Flowers" still has a heated discussion across the country.
Audiences have said that although some of the plots and characters in the play may not fully match reality, this does not affect their love for this drama.
This leads to a deeper question: when evaluating a work, should we start from a personal point of view, or should we look at the value of the work itself objectively? This is undoubtedly a question worthy of our in-depth discussion.
Each work has its own uniqueness, and it is an individual choice of the audience in terms of aesthetics and artistic appreciation. While some people have questioned Blossoms, we should refuse to use extreme language to disparage it.
Objective evaluation helps to establish a rational atmosphere of discussion and enables us to better understand the value of different points of view. This also reflects the audience's different expectations of art.
Li Liqun's criticism may be a more traditional expectation that focuses on logic and emotional expression, but on the other hand, "Flowers" may be an attempt to break through the shackles of tradition and seek new ways of expression and presentation.
In today's cultural context, various art forms are trying to break through the shackles of tradition and seek new means of expression and presentation. The praise and popularity of "Flowers" may be due to its success in exploration and innovation.
Although this controversy over "Flowers" has intensified on the Internet, there is no doubt that this TV series occupies a unique place in the hearts of viewers.
It is not only a TV series that shows the style of Shanghai, but also a work that can touch people's hearts. Li Liqun's remarks may have provided another perspective for the show, triggering viewers to think about different perspectives on Shanghai's culture and history.
After all, everyone's understanding and memory of a city is unique, and this is the diversity and inclusiveness that Shanghai, China's most cosmopolitan city, demonstrates.
Such a view may reflect the audience's diverse expectations for the way the artwork is presented. As a controversial film, audiences also have different opinions, which makes the whole discussion richer.
Li Liqun's remarks struck a chord with the audience and provoked people to think about different perspectives on Shanghai's culture and history. This also shows that the diversity and difference of views in the comments are to be encouraged.
In this debate about "Flowers", perhaps we should respect everyone's views and feelings, and at the same time encourage artists to seek more breakthroughs and innovations in their creation.
After all, the purpose of art is to evoke empathy and thought, not to provoke controversy and disagreement. We should maintain rationality and respect, and work together to protect and inherit the diversity of Chinese culture in the collision and exchange of cultures.
Whether it is the criticism of "Flowers" or the understanding of Shanghai culture, we can build a more inclusive and harmonious cultural community through rational discussion.
(Disclaimer) The process and pictures described in the article are from the Internet, and this article aims to advocate positive social energy and no vulgar and other bad guidance. If it involves copyright or human infringement, please contact us in time, and we will delete the content as soon as possible!