↑↑ ❤❤ If you want to see more exciting content, remember to "follow" me! Thank you for your support! ❤❤↑↑
At sea, there is one sound that can terrify the enemy, and that is the roar of naval guns. Naval guns are the main fire weapons on warships, capable of delivering effective strikes against targets at sea and on shore. However, every time a shell was fired from the ship's guns, an empty shell was left behind. What are these shells dealt with?
Do you take it back and reuse it, or throw it in the sea? Different countries have different practices, and what is behind them?
1. What is a cartridge case? Why recycle?
Shells, as the name suggests, are metal shells that are loaded with artillery shells. Its role is to protect the propellant and warhead inside the shell, provide adequate tightness and stability, as well as provide ignition devices such as primers and fuses. When the shell is fired, the shell is automatically thrown out of the chamber and becomes waste.
So, why recycle shells? There are several main reasons for this.
Bullet casings are generally made of brass or steel, which are valuable resources that can be recycled and reused, reducing waste and cost.
If the shells are discarded into the sea, it will cause pollution and damage to the marine ecology, affecting marine resources and fisheries.
If the shell is picked up by the enemy or a third party, it may reveal information about its own shell specifications, performance, source, etc., and provide intelligence or technology to the enemy.
If shells accumulate on the deck, they will take up space and affect the line of sight, reducing the combat efficiency and safety of the warship.
2. What do countries do with shells? What's the difference?
Different countries have different ways of dealing with bullet casings, mainly depending on their economic strength, technological level, strategic intentions, environmental awareness and other factors. Here are some typical examples.
The United States is one of the richest and most advanced countries in the world, as well as one of the countries with the most naval guns and the most frequent use of them.
The United States has been more casual in its handling of bullet casings, generally throwing them directly into the sea or leaving them for its allies to dispose of. The United States considers the cost of recovering shells higher than their value and has no concerns about the theft of its technology or the impact on the oceans. The United States also has a special practice of using copper artillery shells in some important or sensitive areas to demonstrate its strength and deterrence.
Russia is a resource-rich but economically backward country, as well as a country with a strong tradition of naval artillery. Russia is frugal in its approach to the disposal of shells, which are generally recycled or sold to other countries. Russia believes that recycling shells saves resources and costs, and prevents its technology from being leaked or used by the enemy.
Russia also has a special approach of using steel shells in some strategic points to increase its defense and staying power.
China is a resource-poor but economically developing country, as well as a country with emerging naval artillery capabilities. China's approach to the disposal of bullet casings is balanced, considering both recycling and environmental protection and safety. China believes that recycling shells can reduce waste and pollution, and can also improve its own technology and combat effectiveness.
China also has a special approach of using automatic recovery systems or automatic loading of shells in some disputed or sensitive areas to reduce its own legacy and impact.
3. What does the way the shell is handled reflect?
From the way countries deal with shells, we can see their different characteristics and styles, and we can also get a glimpse of their different goals and intentions.
The way in which the shells are disposed of reflects a country's economic strength and budget level, with the United States being casual because it is rich, Russia being frugal because of poverty, and China being balanced because of development.
The way in which the shells are handled also reflects a country's technological level and innovation ability, with the United States being confident because it is advanced, Russia being cautious because it is backward, and China being aggressive because it is emerging.
The way in which the shells are handled also reflects a country's strategic intentions and attitudes, with the United States being arrogant because of its hegemony, Russia being tough because of its defense, and China being rational because of peace.
epilogue
What to do with the shells left behind after the warship fires shells? This is a deceptively simple but complex question. It not only involves considerations such as resources, environment, and security, but also implies differences in the economy, technology, and strategy of various countries.
By comparing and analyzing the way in which shells are handled in various countries, we can better understand their characteristics and styles, as well as their goals and intentions. In this way, we can look at the sounds of the sea and the secrets of the seabed more objectively.
What do you think about this? "Hit in the comment area" and discuss it together!