Before reading this article, please click "Follow", which is not only convenient for you to discuss and share, but also can bring you a different sense of participation, thank you for your support.
In the vicinity of Southwest University of Science and Technology, a small dispute between an ordinary wonton stand and a female college student has attracted widespread attention and discussion. This wonton stall is run by an elderly couple who have experienced a cerebral infarction and undergone surgery and are not in good health. The female college student is a current student at Southwest University of Science and Technology.
The controversy stems from two main issues: first, the stalls' menus do not clearly indicate the price of each ravioli; Secondly, there was a breakage in the ravioli purchased by the female students. The incident progressed to the point where the female student complained about the problem and claimed to have found green plastic filaments in the wonton after bringing it back to the dormitory. It is worth noting that the female student did not immediately raise the issue with the stall owner, but ended the training a few hours later and went to the stall theory with several classmates, which was interpreted to some extent as an overreaction.
Both sides have their own opinions. The female student accused the old man of being unprofessional and rude, while the old man thought that the female student's accusation was too harsh and did not fit the actual operation of the stall. A schoolgirl wrote an article describing the incident, suggesting that the wonton stand was operating informally, revealing her disapproval of the street food. For the stall owner, her doubts about the price may simply be due to the fact that the students felt that the price was too high, while the old man insisted that the price was fair. In addition, the schoolgirl also threatened the old man to "wait and see" when she left, which seemed to foreshadow the ensuing strife.
After the escalation of the conflict, the police intervened in the incident. The two sides have different accounts of how the police were called, with the female college student claiming that it was a passing classmate who called the police, while the elderly couple said that it was a nearby store that assisted in calling the police. There is also no definitive conclusion on whether the ravioli is filled with plastic, and neither side has been able to provide sufficient evidence.
Finally, there is controversy about the old couple threatening to throw hot soup on the students. The old man said that this was just to stop the disturbance, and he did not really mean it. The response to the incident on the Internet was one-sided, with most netizens leaning towards supporting the elderly couple, criticizing the schoolgirl's behavior as too extreme and irrational. Although the female student's statement is written fluently, she ends up losing points in the face of logic and sincerity. The old man's narrative, though lacking in literary brilliance, is full of details and sincerity of life.
This incident is not only a controversy about consumer disputes, but also reflects the differences in perceptions and expectations between different social groups in society. Female college students rely on their knowledge and logic to demand justice, ignoring human considerations in specific situations. Comparatively speaking, the direct and simple expression of the elderly couple, although not rigorous, is closer to the reality of life. This incident reminds us that when dealing with the contradictions and conflicts of everyday life, we should consider more about the diversity of situations and human nature, rather than relying solely on reason and rules.