The material in this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete.
U.S. hostility toward China has become increasingly apparent, often using national security as an excuse. However, this hostility is particularly evident in China's tech sector. China's maglev technology has recently caused an international sensation, and the former director of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) has been amazed by China's maglev trains. He shared this vehicle with a speed of more than 600 kilometers per hour on foreign social media, which caused widespread popularity. This time, China's technological progress is amazing, especially compared to the United States.
At the same time, the United States appears to be stagnating. The U.S. transportation system and train speeds are no longer satisfactory. Although the Biden administration had planned to strengthen infrastructure to remain competitive, unfortunately, this plan did not go smoothly. In stark contrast, China's infrastructure construction has been growing rapidly, surpassing that of the United States. Some even mock the United States, claiming that China stole the technology from the United States, even though in fact the United States does not have the technology at all.
The United States, one of the world's largest countries, seems to have failed to recognize its shortcomings in time. In today's era of rapid development of science and technology, if you do not advance, you will retreat. Hopefully, the U.S. government will realize this and refocus on its own scientific and technological development, rather than focusing on suppressing other countries. Continuing to treat China with a hostile attitude may have more negative effects on international relations, while cooperation and win-win are more positive options.
In response to the incident, U.S. officials appear to have focused too much on China to ignore the real issues of its food and national security. In fact, the area of land held by Chinese companies is relatively small, even far less than some other countries. Such a move seems more of a political ploy. When considering international threats, the United States should perhaps take a more holistic view of all countries related to its own agriculture, rather than imposing restrictions on China alone.
Although Chinese companies make a relatively small share of U.S. agriculture, U.S. officials seem concerned. One Republican lawmaker even introduced a bill that would ban Chinese capital from investing in U.S. agriculture, prohibiting them from adopting any plans, while not allowing Chinese companies that work with U.S. agriculture to receive government subsidies. Some Democratic lawmakers, however, advocate equal treatment of all countries related to U.S. agriculture and that restrictions should be taken only when national security concerns are considered.
It seems inevitable that the United States will be hostile to China, especially when China's rapid development threatens the position of the United States. Not only that, but the United States also tends to abandon dependence on other countries, and even countries with which it has good relations, such as the European Union, are under pressure from time to time. In recent years, the United States has been taking tough measures against China in areas such as cybersecurity, economy and technology, which has dealt a serious blow to Chinese companies.
The U.S. Congress recently discussed increasing restrictions on foreign investment in domestic agriculture to limit the entry of foreign capital. They claim that Chinese companies are linked to U.S. food and pose a serious threat to national security. In addition, some senators want to distance themselves from China to ensure that U.S. farms are run by Americans, and that a large number of Chinese buyers will be evicted once the bill is implemented. However, this apparent targeting of China has hurt rural America and brought its economy to a standstill.
As China continues to grow, the United States is eager to reduce its dependence on China, especially in areas involving national security. Some states with agriculture as their main industry have expressed support for this position, and some US politicians have also come forward. For example, former Vice President Mike Pence publicly supported restricting foreign investment into U.S. agriculture, emphasizing the protection of U.S. agricultural assets. He also called on the Biden administration to pay attention to the issue to ensure that people in other countries do not receive economic subsidies from the United States to safeguard domestic interests. But this apparent targeting of China has hurt rural America and brought their economies to a standstill.
Summary:
The United States is increasingly hostile to China, especially in China's scientific and technological development. China's maglev technology has caused an international sensation, while the United States seems to be stalling. The U.S. government should recognize the importance of scientific and technological progress in order to maintain international relations and national competitiveness. For Chinese investment in U.S. agriculture
, although relatively small, has raised concerns among U.S. officials. Some lawmakers have proposed legislation that restricts Chinese capital from entering U.S. agriculture and does not allow cooperative Chinese companies to receive government subsidies. However, some Democratic lawmakers advocated fair treatment of all countries related to U.S. agriculture and stressed restrictions when it comes to national security concerns.
The United States has a long history of hostility towards China, often using national security as an excuse. But such hostility can have a negative impact on international relations, because cooperation and win-win are more beneficial. Especially in the field of science and technology, the United States should focus on its own scientific and technological development, rather than focusing on suppressing other countries. China's technological progress is amazing, and the United States should not be stagnated by complacency.
In response to China's restrictions, U.S. officials do not appear to have adequately considered the real issues related to their own food and national security. Chinese companies have a relatively small share of U.S. agriculture, and other countries have larger land areas. Therefore, countries related to their own agriculture should be examined more comprehensively in order to maintain harmony in international relations.
The U.S. relationship with China is complex and diverse, but a balance should be sought to safeguard international and national interests. In the face of global challenges and competition, cooperation and innovation are more active choices.
The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or allude to any real country, political system, organization, race, individual. The above does not mean that the author of this article endorses the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any problems arising above or related to the above and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability. Due to the rules of the platform, you will only be recognized as a fan if you have more interaction with me. If you like my article, you can click "Follow", and you can receive the article push as soon as you become an iron fan. This article is only published in today's headlines, please do not move.