The content of this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete. This article is only published in today's headlines, and it must be investigated!
In the long river of history, the international situation, the great powers, the stories of great people and historical figures, like bright stars, shimmer with unique light in the universe. Today, we're taking you into an even more exciting world of drone invasions in Cambodia and the international concerns and vigilance it has raised.
The incident first came to light in the Cambodia-China Times, mentioning that the Cambodian military had spotted a large number of unidentified drones over villages in Ratanakiri province, 20 kilometers from the Cambodian-Vietnamese border. Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen took this seriously, ordered the deployment of 200 artillery pieces on the Cambodian-Vietnamese border and promised a reward of $200,000 for each drone shot down.
However, behind this seemingly compelling event lies a more complex story. In fact, the source of the drone was identified by the Cambodian military as inside Vietnam, but the Vietnamese government firmly denied that it was related to the incident. Hun Sen believes that Vietnam's response is not hypocritical, because Vietnam and Cambodia have just signed a border cooperation agreement, so there is no reason to actively provoke Cambodia.
It is worth mentioning that there was a terrorist attack in Vietnam not long ago, a terrorist organization called "Del California" attacked two police stations in Duol Le province in Vietnam, causing serious casualties. The incident raises suspicions that the drone invasion into Cambodia may be the operation of the terrorist group to survey the border terrain and military forces and provide intelligence support for future operations.
From Hun Sen's speech, we can deduce a message that the United States may be a "third country" supporting this terrorist group. According to Li Wei, an expert at the China Institute of Contemporary International Relations, the terrorist group, called Del California, is actually a branch of the U.S.-based Interim National Government of Vietnam and the Vietnam Reform Party, which has been recognized as a terrorist organization by the Vietnamese government.
Vietnamese police have arrested 75 suspects who confessed to receiving orders and funding from the U.S. headquarters before launching the attack. The ultimate goal of this terrorist group is to spark unrest in Vietnam. Therefore, the drone invasion of Cambodia is likely to support the terrorist group's actions in an attempt to increase tensions between the two countries.
Dealing with drone invasions is not easy for Cambodia. Due to the smallness, high speed and concealment of UAVs, traditional anti-aircraft artillery is difficult to effectively intercept. The issue has also caught the attention of China, which has the longest land border in the world, involving multiple neighboring countries, with diverse border terrain and complex and severe border defense tasks.
China has top-notch technological prowess in the field of drones, so it has the ability to take a variety of measures to deal with drone invasions. At the Zhuhai air show, Chinese military units demonstrated anti-drone technologies including laser firing systems, small air defense systems and electromagnetic jamming equipment, which are inexpensive and highly accurate, suitable for deployment in border areas.
In short, China has the ability to respond effectively to drone incursions, but more importantly, it recognizes the nature of what the United States may be manipulating behind its back. This incident reminds us that the complexities and interests of international relations are intertwined and require careful response. Cambodia's drone incident may be just the tip of the iceberg, and there may be a larger international political wrangling behind it. In any case, maintaining the country's borders and security is always a priority.
The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or allude to any real country, political system, organization, race, individual. The above does not mean that the author of this article endorses the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising above or related to any of the above, nor does it assume any direct or indirect legal liability.