The material in this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete.
In today's fierce global technology competition, China and the United States have always been in competition. Huawei, as a Chinese communications technology giant, has broken the monopoly position of the United States in the global communications industry because of its breakthroughs in 5G technology and chip design, but it has also attracted fierce opposition from the United States. Since 2019, the United States has continuously tightened sanctions against Huawei, causing important semiconductor suppliers such as TSMC, Qualcomm and Samsung to stop supplying Huawei. However, this global "chip war" has made some chip companies that originally supported US sanctions suffer their own consequences.
The United States has been taking a variety of measures to restrict China's high-end chip development, trying to impose an all-round technology blockade on China by raising barriers, suppressing Chinese technology, and even establishing international alliances. In addition, the United States has also formulated a series of chip bills to try to control the global semiconductor industry chain, and signed agreements with the Netherlands and Japan to block China's purchase of high-end lithography machines and completely interrupt the supply of semiconductor equipment and materials to China. These moves have led to a time when Chinese tech companies have struggled and their development has been hindered.
Huawei's chip and mobile phone business has been hit hard, but it has also made Chinese companies realize the brutality of global technology competition and realize that they must master core technologies and no longer rely on imports. Therefore, Huawei's predicament has spawned the rapid rise of China's independent research and development chip business, and China has also increased investment in domestic semiconductor technology research and development, reducing the number of imported chips year by year. Once China is able to develop alternatives completely on its own, it will no longer rely on chips and equipment from American and Western tech companies.
China is the world's largest semiconductor consumer market, and many semiconductor companies such as Qualcomm, NVIDIA, Samsung and Hynix rely on the Chinese market. However, in the "Sino-US chip war", these companies lost a lot of market share and revenue. Micron, a chip manufacturing company in the United States, is a stark example. Micron has been working to limit the development of China's Yangtze River Storage, trying to monopolize the global memory chip market. However, the results of the review by China's Ministry of Commerce revealed that some of Micron's products were blocked in the Chinese market because of their cybersecurity risks, further exacerbating its predicament.
Another company that has cut off Huawei's supply and fallen into a trough is South Korea's Samsung Electronics. Samsung occupies an important position in the memory chip market, but under the competition of Chinese companies such as Changjiang Storage and Changxin Storage, Samsung's market share has been seriously impacted. Its consecutive quarterly earnings reports show that the company's revenue and net profit have fallen sharply, even to historical lows. This is mainly due to the long-term loss of the Chinese market and the loss of important market share.
The plight faced by Micron and Samsung has alarmed other U.S. semiconductor companies. Many companies have begun to oppose the ongoing "Sino-US chip war" and have taken action to favor China and rejoin the Chinese market. In particular, Qualcomm and Nvidia are deeply aware of the importance of the Chinese market and see that if they continue to support the US sanctions policy, they may follow in the footsteps of Micron and Samsung.
These setbacks teach us an important lesson: it is short-sighted to take sides just because of immediate gains. Abandoning long-term markets and interests will lead to self-destruction.
Globalization has reached a point where no business can easily isolate itself. Especially in a consumer market as large as China, it is impossible for any company to give up easily. In the era of globalization, politicians should be more active in solving problems rather than relying solely on resistance and blockades. The government can take measures to sanction enterprises, but it cannot always interfere in the market behavior of enterprises, and excessive political intervention will destroy market operation and independent innovation.
The U.S. government and its blind followers should be soberly aware that China is not only the world's largest consumer market, but also one of the world's largest industrial clusters, and China has huge advantages in raw material procurement and manufacturing. Without the Chinese market, the global supply chains of many U.S. companies will be severely impacted, and the impact on themselves will be devastating. As a result, the strategy of forcing companies to contain China is doomed to fail.
In short, although the US suppression of Huawei has hit it hard, it has also encouraged China's semiconductor industry and Huawei to pursue independent innovation more firmly. Although there was a cooperation
Partners have become competitors or limited by the United States, but through their own efforts, we will soon see China's self-developed chip products emerge in the global market.
This situation is not only the best affirmation of Huawei's tenacity and self-reliance, but also a warning to those chip companies that have cut off supplies to Huawei and cater to the United States. Choosing to take sides only for immediate temporary interests is short-sighted. However, abandoning long-term markets and cooperation will eventually lead to destruction.
For the U.S. government and some of its blind businesses, they should recognize the reality of globalization. The modern economy is so interconnected that no business can ignore China's huge market. Politicians need to take a more constructive approach to the problem, rather than relying solely on sanctions and blockades. The government can take measures to sanction enterprises, but it cannot interfere in market operation for a long time, otherwise it will destroy the market operation and innovation ability of enterprises.
China is not only the world's largest consumer market, but also one of the world's largest industrial clusters. Whether in raw material procurement or manufacturing, China has huge advantages. Without the Chinese market, the global supply chains of many U.S. companies would be seriously threatened, and the impact on themselves would be catastrophic. As a result, the U.S. government's strategy of forcing companies to contain China is doomed to fail.
In summary, although the United States has adopted a series of restrictive measures against Huawei, Huawei has suffered major setbacks in the short term, but this has also inspired China's semiconductor industry and Huawei's firmer determination to innovate independently. Although some partners have become competitors or are constrained by the United States, through their own efforts, China is moving towards the road of independent research and development, and in the near future, we will see China's chip products emerge in the global market, which will be a significant reflection of China's scientific and technological strength.
The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or allude to any real country, political system, organization, race, individual. The above does not mean that the author of this article endorses the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any problems arising above or related to the above and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
Due to the rules of the platform, you will only be recognized as a fan if you have more interaction with me. This article is only published in today's headlines, please do not move.