The doctor cheated on his mentor, and the level of chat history was shameful. Expose her ambiguous relationship and coercive behavior with her mentor Su. Ling claimed that his mentor, Su, had been harassing him for a long time and hoped to clear his charges through public disclosure. Ling attached photos and audio recordings of interviews with his mentors to the article in an attempt to prove his real experience.
But soon after, Gu, a netizen who claimed to know Ling and Su, put forward a different view in the comment area. Gu claimed that Ling was actually a doctoral student at a university, and Su was also his supervisor. But in fact, it was Ling who took the initiative to cheat on Su, not under Su's pressure.
Gu went on to explain that Ling had been married before her Ph.D., but her husband's financial situation was not ideal, and it was difficult for her to complete her studies. In order to win more financial support for Ling, the mentor deceived Su, hoping that he could use his position to give her some benefits.
Gu said that Su initially provided Ling with a lot of benefits, but recently increased supervision of her superiors, resulting in Su being unable to provide her with financial support. As a result, Ling was emotionally unstable and tried to force Su to pay some subsidies from his salary. However, Su is unwilling to pay for her, which leads to disagreements and conflicts between the two. When Ling's emotions were out of control, he decided to vent his dissatisfaction by posting online. As for whether her mentor Su forced her or she voluntarily had a relationship with her mentor Su, it is impossible to conclude from her public interview records. Ling wisely and openly concealed Su's full name and image.
Gu said that although Ling looked weak and helpless, he was actually a very sinister person. However, this time she chose the wrong way to deal with it, because the chat history she provided did not show that Su forced her. So this time her antics didn't work as well as they should.
After many netizens learned about this, they immediately launched a heated discussion. This controversy has led to thinking about the bottom line of morality. On the one hand, we must be wary of tutors using their positions to make inappropriate demands and pressure on students to crack down on such unethical behavior. On the other hand, it is also necessary to examine students' behavior of exploiting relationships for personal gain to avoid moral turpitude and illegal behavior.
This incident makes people think about the importance of social relations and moral concepts in today's society. Both mentors and students should always adhere to the bottom line of morality and maintain the purity and health of their profession and relationships. It is the responsibility of the tutor to manage the academic growth of the student, and the student should respect the rights and interests of the tutor and others.
However, the reality is often complex and nuanced. Money, status, and desire are often catalysts that undermine relationships and moral outcomes. We need a fair, transparent and rigorous governance system to ensure a fair and safe academic environment.
This incident also reminds us that in the era of information explosion, we must maintain an objective and rational point of view, investigate facts and truth. Do not blindly follow the trend of public opinion, use critical thinking and insight, and rationally discuss and comment.
Only with a comprehensive thinking and theoretical foundation can academic and social progress be guaranteed. It is necessary to cultivate students' good ethical concepts and moral accomplishment, and become a good example for academic and social construction.
Only published in the headline number, all other platforms are porters
The picture comes from the Internet, invaded and deleted.
Original is not easy, welcome to forward!
What is your opinion on this? Welcome to leave a comment in the comment area!