preface
There is a Bao Qingtian in Kaifeng, iron-faced selfless to distinguish loyalty and traitors", and recently, a "Qingtian judge" also appeared on the Qingdao subway, and the righteous "subway judge" slapped the blue-clothed old man who planned to occupy ten seats after carefully listening to the "ins and outs of the case", but can the uncle obey? Ironclad can't be convinced!
So the grandpa and aunt made a second appeal without accepting the trial, and as a result, the "subway judge" not only upheld the original judgment in the second trial, but even punished the aunt for "hitting the mouth", and the two big forced pockets completely stunned the grandpa and aunt who occupied the position, and the final result was also unexpected, so what is going on? Let's take a look!
The beginning and end of the contest for seats
It started with an aunt occupying two seats and the subway was overcrowded. Another aunt made a request to give way, but was refused, sparking an argument.
The two people "needle to Mai Mang" do not give in to each other, this wave of high-decibel "talks" also attracted many onlookers, but onlookers are watching, no one has come forward to help, but Aunt No. 1 itself does not account for any reason, and it is gradually in the downside, at this time, an old man in blue clothes next to him watched the battle situation gradually become clear and gradually became untenable, and also joined this "talk".
This uncle did not help Aunt No. 2 after joining the war, but chose to help Aunt No. 1, the reason is that it turned out to be Aunt No. 1's wife, the joining of the blue-clothed uncle made the firepower value of this "war of words" pulled up to the peak, not only the people in their own carriage were watching, but also the people in other carriages came to the center of the war, and many onlookers were a little unable to stand when the personnel of the two sides were arguing, after all, it was not reasonable for one person to occupy multiple positions, let alone at the peak of the crowd.
"Subway trial" with rich expressions!
But the blue-clothed uncle is still completely immersed in this "controversy", and the aunt No. 2 also has the posture of "tongue fighting group Confucianism", but just when the victory and defeat are not yet known, the blue-clothed uncle's words instantly pulled the center of this "controversy" down on himself, it turned out that the uncle said a sentence "I occupy ten seats and you can't control it", this sentence was originally nothing particularly noteworthy, but it couldn't stand the onlookers to give strength!
A young man from several carriages away first "listened to the appeals of both sides" very seriously, and then when he heard that the uncle was going to occupy ten positions, he was first confused, and then his face was full of disbelief, and when he confirmed that what he heard was true, his eyes were full of shock, and finally he angrily carried out the "trial", and a very powerful "big forced pocket" fanned over, the forehand and the back, "pop", the blue-clothed uncle and the aunt No. 1 who occupied the position were all blinded, this movement, it hurts to listen to it!
"Who am I? Where am I? What am I doing? A series of question marks appeared on the two people, and this "war of words" also had to come to an end, because Aunt No. 1 and her wife Uncle Lan went to chase people, and it had to be mentioned that this young man shouted "bastard, it makes sense to occupy a seat" after fanning the uncle a "big forced pocket", while retreating back, intending to "wave his sleeves, hide his skills and fame", but the grandpa and aunt will definitely not do it!
"He ran away and he chased, he was difficult to fly", but unexpectedly, after the two caught up, before the two people continued to appeal, the young man who was called "subway judge" by netizens gave Aunt No. 1 a "big forced pocket", want to appeal a second time? Inexistent! The second prosecution upheld the original judgment and directly "withdrew from the court", I have to say that this "subway judge" has Bao Qingtian's "fearless" spirit, which is deeply true!
Uncle and aunt saw that this situation is not good, their two people accounted for two of the "old, weak, sick and disabled" of the "old", and such a young and strong young man will definitely not be able to do people, so they chose to call the police, and the customer service of Qingdao Metro said that this matter was an uncivilized behavior, because it involved the conflict between passengers, and it has been handed over to the police to deal with, but the follow-up that everyone is looking forward to has also come, and the final result is that the two parties have reached a settlement, because the young "subway judge" has certain mental disorders!
Analysis of the behavior of the "subway judge"
The young man was dubbed the "Subway Judge" and his actions sparked widespread controversy. On the one hand, his intervention may have prevented a dispute that could turn violent and maintained order. However, his violent behavior also raised moral and legal problems, especially after slapping the boss and the seat-occupying aunt, and his behavior was considered too drastic. The incident provoked deep thinking about the balance between "justice" and "excessive violence."
Mental health and social responsibility
An important aspect is that the "subway judge" is considered to have a mental disorder. This makes us reflect on society's attitude towards mental health issues and concern for mental health patients. This event also highlights the need for more investment and attention to mental health to ensure the safety and equity of society.
Incivility in public transport
The incident has also brought renewed attention to uncivilized behavior in public transport. In crowded subways and buses, incivility often leads to disputes and conflicts. Passengers should be urged to communicate with staff when confronted with uncivilized behaviour rather than acting privately. In addition, public transport companies should also strengthen publicity and training to educate passengers to follow traffic rules and respect others.
Ride problems for the elderly
Another issue that needs to be discussed is the use of seniors in public transport. Older persons are often a vulnerable group in society and deserve more care and respect. However, the problem of competing for seats during peak hours often occurs, creating contradictions between the elderly and the young. To avoid this, older people can consider avoiding peak periods, while younger people should also pay more attention to the needs of older people.
Reconciliation and lessons
In the end, the two sides of the dispute reached a settlement. This shows that there are opportunities and methods for resolving disputes in society. However, the incident also taught us that violence is not the best way to solve the problem, no matter what the circumstances. We should rely more on communication, understanding and the law to resolve disputes.
Pros and cons of the traffic era
The incident went viral on social media, sparking widespread attention and discussion. In the age of traffic, some behaviors may be touted because of the popularity of the network, but they can also lead to unpredictable consequences. Therefore, we need to be cautious about hyping and promoting bad behavior on social media to avoid negative impacts on society.
After that, the young man's mother and friends said "please don't advocate his behavior too much, let alone disturb him offline" It turned out that the young man's mother paid a lot for him, and was afraid that netizens would make the "subway judge" feel that this behavior was correct, and go to more "trials", after all, he with mental disorders can not completely and clearly distinguish the real "right and wrong", his friends also said that he once buried himself in sand at school to absorb nutrients, but fortunately was discovered by others in time.
"Metro Judge" has maintained the justice in his heart, has become his own hero, and has been welcomed by many netizens, but there are advantages and disadvantages in the traffic era, which can make his "righteous but not necessarily right" behavior visible to more people, but it may also be seen by more people while more incalculable consequences, so that he lives in a world that is not originally flooded with traffic may be better for him!
epilogue
The contest is a complex social case that touches on a wide range of issues, from incivility to mental health to the impact of social media. It reminds us that social problems require us to work together to solve them, but also require more understanding and respect for others. Ultimately, we hope to reflect and learn from this event to create a more harmonious, safe and civilized society.