Today I saw a case of super Hegel, the philosophy of female anchors vs little Bourgeois objectification of women's theory there is a female UP lord named Zhang Zhengwu, the main speaker of philosophy, the video content is dressed and drifting

Today I saw a case of super Hegel, the philosophical female anchor vs. the little Bourgeois objectified female theory

There is a female UP master named Zhang Zhengwu, who teaches philosophy, and the video content is wearing a beautiful skirt and painting a beautiful shape, and the long hair shawl laughs while talking to you about Hegel and Lacan.

Then someone commented that you were dressed up too little bourgeois to satisfy some kind of projection

Female UP Master Responds Directly:

1 As long as I buy a 60 yuan skirt, I can get 200 yuan more from live broadcasting and playback, which is a real benefit

2 Beauty is a symbol, in my female anchor's work link from the tool attribute, is my tool as a laborer is a weapon, why not use a weapon? As a working class, never forget to increase your productivity.

3 Wearing a beautiful dress to talk about philosophy is not satisfied with some kind of projection, but you think that philosophy professors should be plain and serious, academic and old pedantic, which is the stereotype projection of the serious scriptures

4 Back to reality, do I have to go out of my way to dress up ugly in order to talk about philosophy? Is this practical? Many times your criticism is just to satisfy yourself standing on the moral high ground and not solving practical problems

5 The point is not what I wear, it's what I say

The theory is beautiful, but reality requires rationality

Very Hegel [laughing and crying]