Must overthrow the Russian regime?
No one could have imagined that today, when the "Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence" are deeply rooted in the hearts of the people, there would be a country that would interfere in the sovereignty of other countries in such a dignified manner, just like the western hegemonist style.
And this sentence comes precisely from the mouth of the Lithuanian foreign minister.
On May 10, Lithuanian Foreign Minister Landz Bergis said in an interview with US media that European and American countries should consider the situation between Russia and Ukraine strategically, because "Russia has broken away from the civilized world order, and when russia's regime ends, its belligerent state will end." ”
In other words, the Lithuanian side does not believe that the end of the Russo-Ukrainian War will allow the West to return to the era of "dominating the world order."
In this regard, Landzbergis "hinted" that it may take quite a long time to change this situation, because we do not change it by any active means. So it can only change from within Russia.
The implication is that only by taking "active means" and having to make changes within Russia can Europe and the United States put the situation of Moscow's destruction of the "civilized world order" back on track.
The act of infringing on the sovereignty of other countries and even plotting to overthrow the regime of one country is said to be so "grandiose", and indeed only the United States and Western countries that are accustomed to it can behave so "justly and awe-inspiringly.".
Having said all that, Lithuania's foreign minister seems to be just paving the way for a "permanent U.S. presence in Lithuania," claiming that this is the only way to "deter Russia the most" and prepare to seek more support at the NATO summit next month.
Is this Lithuania's true words, or is it a secret instruction from the United States?
Since the outbreak of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, Lithuania's name as an "anti-Russian vanguard" has become more and more loud, not only was it the first in the European Union to stop importing Russian gas, but also on the 10th, the Lithuanian parliament unanimously passed a resolution to identify Russia as a "country that supports and implements terrorism".
There is no doubt that this is a cruel offense to Moscow, and the Russian parliamentarian solemnly warned that "economic and trade relations between the two countries may be interrupted, and diplomatic relations may also be reduced to the level of chargé d'affaires", which is only one step away from severing diplomatic relations.
Having done so much, if it is only Lithuania's "name", it is too rich. All kinds of indications show that behind this is bound to be the instructions of Washington, and the US government is using its strong influence to encourage its allies to increase the intensity of "anti-Russia" and continue to fan the flames.
However, the "small abacus" of the United States and the West trying to press Russia's "rafters" to maintain and expand hegemony has long been clearly seen by other countries.
On May 11, the United States received two more pieces of bad news, once again proving that hegemonism is unpopular and that its decay is a historical necessity.
First, Iran's president announced his best political performance since taking office, alluding to the fact that U.S. sanctions are "nothing more than that."
A few days ago, Iranian President Lehit publicly announced in a live interview that his government has "doubled" oil sales since it came to power on August 5 last year, and even if the United States continues to impose sanctions, Iran can receive at least $30 billion in oil export revenue today.
In addition, Iran's total foreign trade has reached the $100 billion milestone, and Lehi confidently assured the Iranian people that the government can "ensure that there is no problem in the lives of all Iranians." ”
Such outstanding political achievements are of course indispensable to the support of other friendly countries, whether it is the "China-Iran 25-Year Comprehensive Cooperation Agreement" signed last year, or Lehi's visit to Russia at the beginning of the year, which are the cornerstones of support for Iran.
At present, the Lehi government can finally "straighten the waist", which has brought 3 impacts.
First, as an "anti-American fighter" within Iran, Lehi's government's excellent achievements show that "anti-American" is not terrible, and it can also make Iran live a good life. In contrast, the "pro-Western faction" within Iran is bound to be greatly weakened, and it is not easy for the United States and the West to secretly intervene in Iran's internal affairs.
Second, the failure of US sanctions on Iran has allowed the latter to have more chips in the long-term stalemate of the US-Iran "Vienna Negotiations". Since then, even if Washington continues to delay negotiations and make unrealistic demands, Tehran has enough confidence to accompany him to the end.
Third, the oil export trade is the backbone of Iran's economy, and the United States has forcibly promoted the so-called "Iranian oil ban" by rallying alliances and coercing other countries, which has now been used as a "waste paper".
Earlier, Iran's oil minister, Ogi, revealed that Iran "sold oil to places that Americans could not have imagined" by using various means to win contracts and find buyers.
Are there any U.S. allies among these buyers? The answer is self-explanatory, perhaps including U.S. energy companies. It is not difficult to see that the United States and the West are not "monolithic", let alone eternal friends in the face of interests.
Second, the President of Mexico took a stand and angrily denounced the United States for undermining the unity of the Americas.
On May 10, after concluding his first official visit to Cuba, Mexican President López López said on the same day that the issue of the invitation list for the Summit of the Americas must be resolved as soon as possible, and that if not all countries were invited, "the Mexican government will send only one representative, and I will not attend the meeting."
As the most important regional summit in the americas as a whole, the Summit of the American States will hold its ninth session from 5 to 8 June since its inception in 1994. However, the United States, as the host of this session, released early information that it did not intend to invite the leaders of Cuba, Venezuela and Nicaragua to attend.
Such a "disrespectful" approach is obviously to use this summit as a "stage" for the Biden administration, and any discordant voices will be blocked in advance, which has the meaning of "one word".
However, the Americas are not the only place in the United States after all.
So far, in addition to the statement of the Mexican president, the Argentine government has issued an appeal to the summit to avoid excluding any country. In addition, Caribbean countries may have resorted to collective boycotts, and Antigua and Barbuda has threatened not to participate in the summit.
It seems that the Biden administration has committed public outrage. In this regard, it is necessary to make 3 points.
1, for the Biden administration, the Mexican president's refusal to attend would be a major blow. Since taking office, the White House has achieved little on immigration, and it has hoped to reach an important agreement with Mexico at this summit, but now it has the potential to "fail".
And with the midterm elections approaching, it's time for the Biden administration to make a choice.
2, since the first time since the Summit of the Americas was first held, there are so many American countries and the United States "calling the board". This also shows that the United States is no longer the United States of the past, and the pace of decline of its hegemony is accelerating, which is a good opportunity for many American countries to get rid of bullying and develop themselves.
3, not long ago, Indonesia, the rotating chairman of the Group of Twenty (G20), Cambodia, the rotating chairman of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), and Thailand, the rotating chairman of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC), just issued a joint statement, saying that it would invite all member countries to participate in the organization summit.
This practice has also been interpreted by the international community as "inviting Russia to participate in the meeting and confronting certain pressure countries, such as the United States."
All indications show that the process of multipolarization of the world's political landscape will not be stopped by the obstruction of individual countries, that the basic norms governing international relations should be respected by all countries, and that the United States' attempt to "isolate hostile countries" will only backfire.