Last December, the classic game "Three Kingdoms Kill" officially landed on Steam.
I still remember that this game was hot enough, and I saw many friends playing online and offline.
Of course, as a game that has been born for more than ten years, the popularity of "Three Kingdoms Killing" has long been less than that of Yong.
The launch of Steam is supposed to make no waves.
However, "Three Kingdoms Kill" was only one day on the shelves, unlocking the achievement of "bad reviews".
This really makes people stunned.
Judging from the evaluation feedback, the bad reviews given by players are not something wrong with the game content, but the kryptonite is serious.
If nothing else, "Three Kingdoms Kill" (Steam Edition) directly writes a big "free to collect" in the novice tutorial.
But a closer look found that it was free to collect after recharging.
I wonder if you have any misunderstandings about the word "free."
In addition, the Steam version was originally a port of the previous "10th Anniversary Trial Edition".
However, the money and krypton gold charged by old players in the previous version are not counted in the Steam version.
Because the data between the two is not interoperable.
A set of riot operations came down, which instantly triggered the player's long-term dissatisfaction with the accumulation of the "Three Kingdoms Kill" development company tour card.
▲ National scolding with the flavor of "Three Kingdoms Killing"
Like the new and old version of the data is not interoperable, the new character settings are complicated, the character card package pricing are the hardest hit areas for players to complain about.
Originally, the card game of "Three Kingdoms Kill" was also reasonable for players to pay for new weapons.
But some powerful characters came up to sell at high prices, like the "Zuo Ci" list price of 198 yuan at one time.
This money is used to buy physical genuine cards, and you can buy a complete set.
Finally, with the cooperation of players, "Three Kingdoms Kill" directly squeezed the "god work" "eFootball 2022" off the altar and won the first place.
But it's the penultimate one.
By the way, let me show you why eFootball 2022 is called a god work.
▲Image source network
Originally, this matter should have come to an end, but in the past two days, "Three Kingdoms Killing" has returned to the public eye.
"Three Kingdoms Killing", which was originally "bad reviews", has recently rebounded to 32% in praise.
Because there was another game with it competing for the "first list" - "Ghost Valley Eight Wilds".
It is estimated that there are small partners who have paid attention to the game circle, and they have heard this name before.
Isn't this game quite well received?
Here's the thing, on April 18, Ghost Valley Eight Wilds released a version update.
Previously promised to bring the MOD editor and workshop to the game, this time finally put this pie on the cake.
However, this "Workshop" is not the one that Comes with Steam, but a version developed and produced by the game team.
Moreover, after the player clicks on the editor, he finds that he needs to agree to a Mod Editor User Agreement.
Read the content carefully and you will find that the agreement states that players uploading MODs need to go through official review.
Officials have the authority to verify, modify, delete, and remove MODs without prior notice.
In the event of an accident, the responsibility lies with the player.
After agreeing to the terms, players also have to log in to a dedicated Fanbook webpage, then select MOD, download, and manually install.
The process is as cumbersome as giving pirated games MODs.
Originally, Steam's official workshop only needed one-click subscription to install, and it became N-step in the three-way editor of "Ghost Valley Eight Wilds".
The game's producers responded by not using Steam's official tools to prevent content with ulterior motives.
But some players are unhappy with such a statement.
Some people believe that the Steam Workshop gives producers a "first review and then pass" option, and it is impossible for a producer to be unaware.
Later, there are also deductions from the producers to divert traffic to the three-party website in order to "just suck the money".
Subsequently, the producers of "Ghost Valley Eight Wilds" sent a letter of apology again.
The content is mainly: unfamiliar with the MOD ecology, personal emotional instability, turn off jump Fanbook, actively communicate with Steam, improve the official editor.
But whether the player accepts it or not, it can't change the fact that the praise rate of "Ghost Valley Eight Wilds" has plummeted during this time.
Some players also "intimately" pointed out that Steam has a mechanism to prevent malicious brushing of bad reviews.
It is recommended to brush the praise for the "Three Kingdoms Killing" next door to help "Ghost Valley Eight Wilds" grab the "bottom throne".
"Three Kingdoms Kill" players could not sit still when they saw this move, and also ran to the "Ghost Valley Eight Wilds" side to brush praise.
Therefore, there are two gamers who brush up on each other and hope to squeeze each other out of the first place in the bad evaluation list.
However, the early praise of "Ghost Valley Eight Wilds" accounted for the majority, so at present, "Three Kingdoms Killing" is still far ahead of the overall list.
Does this count as "skinny camels bigger than horses"?
Next, it depends on whether "Ghost Valley Eight Wilds" can regain its reputation.