As we all know, games have become an indispensable part of many people's lives, after all, games can bring fun to everyone and let the hard-working workers relax and relax.
Players not only invest money and time, but also maintain the game they love, will fight back in the face of other groups' smear, and the same type of gamers will also have a fierce debate online because the game is better, who doesn't want to make their love of the game the most well-known and highly acclaimed one?
Recently, however, two groups of players had a dispute over who played the worst game, and even began to give each other praise. What's going on here?
In fact, the two players clashed for the first place in the steam platform bad review list.
One of the parties is the player of "Three Kingdoms Kill", and the players said that the first place in the bad review list must be a dog card (the player's nickname for the game's official game board game), except for the dog card, no one else is worthy of this position. "Three Kingdoms Kill" Everyone knows that the former national board game, but now the game only kryptonite gold, as soon as the steam platform is launched, it is a tidal wave of bad reviews, which is worthy of the game that will write how krypton gold is written into the novice tutorial.
The other player is from "Ghost Valley Eight Wilds", it is reasonable to say that the initial evaluation of "Ghost Valley Eight Wilds" is still good, how did it fall to this point? It turns out that the game's official recently launched creative workshop is too bad, no - can not be said to be too bad, it is already a betrayal of the player, not only inconvenient to use, but also let the mod creators give the official white work, and the creative workshop of other games is not the same thing at all. So the players were angry, how can there be such a brazen person in the world? Bad reviews, must be bad reviews.
One side is the old hatred, the other is the new hatred, the players on both sides invariably brushed the praise for the other party's game, after all, the bad review list can only have one king. Ghost Valley players say that Three Kingdoms Kill is a free-to-play game, this wave of advantages in me, while Three Kingdoms Kill players say do you know how krypton this game is? Buying a game is a small problem for us.
Although there was a dispute, the world seemed to be harmonious again at this moment. I hope that game manufacturers can take into account the experience of players while making money, and also hope that there will be more excellent domestic games.
I'm a maru gamer, and I thank you for your likes, comments, and attention.
What do you think of this dispute? (I specially gave a steam to the Three Kingdoms to kill a bad review)