As a very important economic source in the battle, in the process of fighting between the two sides, regardless of whether the other side has a mine in normal operation, as long as the opponent has a mine, most players want to deal with the opponent's mine as soon as possible. However, when the opponent's mine has been running smoothly for some time and the relevant fortifications have been established, it is very difficult to dismantle it. At this time, some players will choose to lose some of their own units to forcibly dismantle the opponent's mine. However, this way of using higher battle losses to forcibly dismantle opponents and divide mines often needs to meet the following specific conditions.
There are many classes that need to be transformed
In a conventional game, if we choose the main battle force with more losses to forcibly dismantle the opponent's mine, although it can affect the opponent's economic resources, our own losses will be very large, and on the whole, there are still some gains that are not worth the losses. However, when we have many classes that are difficult to play and urgently need to be transformed, it is obviously a very good choice to use them to forcibly dismantle opponents and divide mines. Taking the Terran against the Night Elves as an example, when the main combat strength of the Night Elves is AC, the actual combat effect of the Terran infantry is very high, and it is obviously not cost-effective to forcibly exchange the opponent's mine, but when the opponent fawn appears on the scene and is still improving the technology to prepare for the appearance of the bear deer, the role of the infantry will gradually decrease, and even can only be reduced to the experience points of the opponent. At this time, it is obviously a good choice to forcibly dismantle the opponent's mine at the cost of losing some infantry.
The opponent is in a critical period of technological upgrading
Or take the aforementioned Terran and Night Elves game as an example, in the case that we have more Terran infantry, and the opponent's main battle class is still AC with a small number of deer, if the opponent's main base is still studying 3 technologies, then choosing to forcibly change the opponent's mine at this point in time is also a very good choice. Because, after replacing the opponent's mine at this point in time, the opponent will basically be unable to form the bear deer army in a short period of time after the completion of the 3 science and technology due to the significant reduction of economic resources. And we can use the population vacated after sending off the infantry to start exploding, so that we can have the superior class for a long time to come, and the actual combat effect will naturally not be too bad.
When you are ready to break the population
If both sides have a mine and have experienced a period of balance of power, when we are ready to break the population and explode, we can also choose to forcibly dismantle the opponent's mine. After all, in the case of a balance of power between the two sides, when we are ready to break the population and explode the troops, the opponent's intentions are actually similar. At this time, as long as we can dismantle the opponent's mine, even if the loss is slightly larger, we can still have the advantage in the next game. The reason for this is that after dismantling the opponent's mine, as long as our loss is not particularly large, we can replenish the lost combat effectiveness in a relatively short period of time; and after the opponent loses the mine, it will be much more difficult for the troops who want to replenish the economy in a short period of time and produce sufficient combat strength.
Its own advantages, forced demolition losses are not large
In addition to the several cases mentioned above, generally only we have some advantages, and when the loss of the opponent's mine is not very large, it can also be directly demolished. After all, after such a forced demolition of the opponent's mine, although there will be losses, it will also make the opponent less likely to accumulate advantages, and in general, we are more cost-effective.