Beijing time on April 24, after the "Football" newspaper exposed that the Football Association temporarily lifted the ban on 3 clubs that were banned from reinforcements, which caused heated discussion, this morning, the well-known football journalist Ma Dexing made a more detailed report on the matter, Ma Dexing said that the reason why the Football Association lifted the ban was because these clubs came up with specific solutions. However, such a statement was denied by Li Xuan, a media person in the "Football" newspaper.
Ma Dexing said that the temporary lifting of the transfer ban of Wuhan, Chongqing and Zibo Keju by the Football Association this time is not a change of day, because these three clubs have proposed to the Football Association to suspend the implementation of the transfer ban at the same time, but also submitted a package of specific implementation plans to the Football Association to solve the problem.
For the solutions of the three clubs, Ma Dexing mentioned them all. Chongqing has promised to pay all the arrears in one lump sum by July 31, and they have reached a settlement with the players concerned. The Wuhan team also promised to pay all the arrears by July 31, and Zibo Keju promised to pay all the arrears in three phases and three times by July 31.
In addition, the three clubs also made it clear that if they could not fulfill their promises, they were willing to accept any penalties from the Football Association, including prohibiting newly registered players from continuing to participate, or even deducting points from the league. Under such circumstances, the Football Association finally agreed to the application of the three clubs and opened a temporary transfer window for them, so we saw that on April 22, wuhan completed the transfer registration procedures for 4 players. According to the previous news of media person Zhao Zhen, this temporary transfer window was closed on the 23rd.
However, for Ma Dexing's report, Li Xuan, a media person in football newspaper, did not agree. She believes that the solution does not really solve the problem, and questions whether it is reasonable and legal to lift the ban easily, and the FA's move is also suspected of violating the association's constitution and interfering with the work of the disciplinary committee.
In addition, Li Xuan did not fully agree with the specific solutions mentioned in the report. Li Xuan said on his personal social account that the Chongqing team did submit a specific plan, and indeed reached a settlement with the players, and the debts involved in their cases were very small. But some teams did not reach the so-called solution to the problem package, because they did not agree with the relevant penalties of the disciplinary committee, and they were very tough, refusing to pay the relevant amount, which was also confirmed by the relevant people involved in specific cases.
It is worth mentioning that after winning the lawsuit, the players of the Chinese First Division team Zibo Keju originally hoped that this punishment would prompt the club to negotiate with the players, and as a result, once the ban was lifted, the club did not negotiate again.
According to Ma Dexing, the FA's lifting of the ban is a pragmatic approach. This is indeed a good thing for the club, but has the FOOTBALL Association considered the interests of the players. The reason why the players arbitrate with the Football Association is because the consultation with the club is fruitless, and they have been forced to be helpless at this step, which is the last way they can think of to safeguard their legitimate rights and interests.
Moreover, if the club really has no way to pay all the arrears on time, as promised, and then the Football Association really punishes the club and imposes a ban on the "newly registered players", then how can the rights and interests of these players be safeguarded? It is unfair that the responsibility that should have been borne by the club was eventually transferred to the players.
The Football Association has repeatedly believed in the club, but the club's rebellion is not a matter of one day or two, and such connivance will only make them more fearless. Our professional football has taken a sharp turn for the worse in recent years, which is also directly related to the connivance of the Football Association. If the Football Association can't really "do things according to the rules", then Chinese football should not think about really standing up.