With the announcement of new fines by the Chinese Football Association, Shandong Taishan foreign aid Ju Desong and Wuhan three town foreign aid Aziz were suspended for 5 rounds and 4 rounds respectively and fined. Unsurprisingly, as soon as these two fines were announced, they caused great controversy from the outside world. For the punishment of these two players, the Football Association seems to be difficult to convince, which shows that after the "blind toss" in recent years, the credibility of the Football Association has already fallen to the bottom.
Judson broke the bridge of the opponent's Belic nose with a punch in the match against Tianjin Jinmen Tigers, and was eventually fined 50,000 yuan by the Football Association for 5 games. There are two controversies about this punishment: first, before Judson hit someone, Beric had obvious small actions to harass him, but escaped punishment; Second, if the punishment is based on "breaking the bones" of the opponent, then Judson's penalty of 5 games is obviously too light, after all, just a few years ago, Beijing Guoan player Zhang Xizhe touched his opponent's cheek and was banned for 12 games; At the same time, Shanghai Port foreign aid Oscar was banned for 8 games for kicking people with the ball.
In contrast, Judson suspended Beric for only five games for breaking the bone, and the football association does seem to have "lenient". But this begs the question, what criteria does the Football Association base on for the number of matches? In fact, there may be no standards at all. In the 2017 season, when Zhang Xizhe was banned for 12 games and Oscar was banned for 8 games, Guangzhou Evergrande striker Alan who elbowed the opponent player was only banned for 8 games, while Shanghai Shenhua player Qin Sheng stepped on the opponent's foot and was directly banned for half a year. Even in the same season, the FA's punishment scale cannot be uniform, and it is no wonder that Judson's punishment is now so controversial.
Of course, from another point of view, the Football Association is also "paying" for its past mistakes. Many fines for the 2017 season are obviously very unreasonable today, but the Football Association insisted on going its own way, ignoring the rules of the "Discipline Manual", and severely punished all the players who violated the rules, which gave birth to Zhang Xizhe and Oscar, who have been cherished for crazy fines so far.
It is worth noting that it was Du Zhaocai, who was in charge of the football association at that time, who has now collapsed, and this "number one" who did not understand the football business at all single-handedly dominated the madness of the football association in the opening of penalties that year, so it can also be said that the football association has not completely got rid of the "poison" of Du Zhaocai's period.
If the outside world's doubts about Judson's fine mainly focus on scale, then the football association banned Aziz for 4 games, which is completely inexplicable. Although Aziz did trample on the opposing player during the match, neither the referee, the assistant referee nor the video referee said anything further during the match, and it is incomprehensible that the Football Association suddenly decided to temporarily suspend the player a few days after the end of the match. It is no wonder that there are voices saying that the Football Association is deliberately "targeting" the three towns of Wuhan.
Last year, the three towns of Wuhan became famous for shelling the "underworld forces" within the Football Association. If this fine is really because of the "sequelae" of the Wuhan Three Towns shelling the Football Association last year, or if it is really the Football Association taking the opportunity to retaliate against the Wuhan Three Towns, then after this round of football storms, whether the "black sheep" within the Football Association have been eliminated is a debatable issue.