Li Xuan: It is suggested that the Football Association dig deep into the roots of Ma Ning's ideology, and this kind of wrong punishment refreshes the perception of football

Understand the Emperor of the Ball

2024-05-01 17:14Posted on the official account of Zhejiang Xiangqiudi

The Chinese Football Association recently announced the results of the fifth referee review of the referee committee of the Chinese Football Association, the first precedent is the 82nd minute of the 8th round of the Chinese Super League Zhejiang vs Beijing Guoan, which caused controversy in the penalty penalty award, and determined that the referee's decision to change the penalty penalty was wrong and VAR intervention was wrong. In response to this problem, media person Li Xuan expressed his views on social media.

Li Xuan posted on social media that his work group questioned the penalty on the day of the game, and wrote: "This is the day of the match between the Zhejiang team and the Guoan team, and the speech of my colleague in our editorial center group, everyone was shocked by this penalty at that time. In particular, this colleague has been doing league coverage for more than 30 years. ”

"Can anyone explain to me, what is the situation with Comrade Ma Ning? You say that he is a problem of professional ability? He is still so highly used, after the AFC has used it a few times, the people who defend him cannot listen to the slightest question about him. What is the situation? It is suggested that the Football Association dig deep into the roots of his thoughts, and this kind of counterjudgment is really refreshing the perception of football. ”

According to the work group conversation provided by Li Xuan, her colleague complained about the penalty, lamenting that she had watched the ball for decades, and it was the first time she saw a team being awarded a penalty because a player was pushed down by the opposing player's foot, and this was still awarded at the instructions of the VAR referee. In addition, Li Xuan's colleague also thinks that there is no referee for the anti-corruption and anti-crime campaign, which is very unreasonable.

Conclusion of the Football Association's review:

Case 1: In the 8th round of the Chinese Super League, Zhejiang VS Beijing Guoan, in the 82nd minute of the game, when the No. 45 player of the Zhejiang team and the No. 17 player of the Beijing Guoan team were scrambling in the latter's penalty area, the two sides made physical contact and fell to the ground. The referee did not give a foul, VAR intervened, and after the referee was on the scene to review it, he changed the foul to the No. 17 player of the Beijing Guoan team and awarded a penalty.

Regarding this precedent, the majority of the members of the review group held that the No. 45 player of the Zhejiang team committed a foul first during the scramble, and the subsequent actions of the No. 17 player of the Beijing Guoan team should not be regarded as a foul, and the referee's decision to change the penalty was wrong, and the VAR intervention was wrong.

•