Today, I still talk about the works of the first national exhibition.
I had wanted to update this series for a long time, but due to recent personal physical reasons, it was inconvenient to start, and I said less.
This just gave me a little time to think, during this time I also heard Mr. Liu Zhengcheng, a famous calligraphy theorist and president of the International Calligraphy Association, talk about the problem of calligraphy criticism, which talked about the difficulty of calligraphy criticism, which was quite touching.
Works of the 1st National Exhibition
I am not a professional calligrapher, let alone a professional calligraphy critic, just a calligraphy enthusiast with a big mouth and a rectum, so I dare to say anything, when I should express worship, I will express worship, and I will not cover up when I criticize, even if the other party is a big master, about this, everyone is interested in looking at the previous few comments.
Of course, due to non-professionalism, many problems can not be said on the point, and even looking back at the more funny common sense errors, so that xiaobian is ashamed, but Xiaobian thinks that it can be a little different in the calligraphy criticism circle of "hello and hello to everyone", and it is not a big deal to be ugly.
Well, look at the works of the predecessors in the first national exhibition.
This is not a batch, written very seriously, every word is very serious, the style of the whole work is the epitome of a book world at that time, if you look at it from the perspective of the current exhibition body, it is indeed not a work favored by the judges.
It is rare to see who the author of the work is, and I think that this must be a person who has contributed to the field of calligraphy, such as a writer, collector, etc., who was invited to participate in the exhibition of the calligraphy circle, and after watching for half a day, I did not see who wrote it, and everyone can help me identify it.
The thin lines that flickered back and forth made me feel uncomfortable, and the whole work also had a sense of depression, filling up too much.
This kind of work should be particularly popular at that time, and the public also liked this kind of work, easy to identify, beautiful, and have a mass base.
Was this one of the "two kangs" at that time? There was a Kang Yong who wrote about Ou Kai in the previous issue, when the small editor thought of deserting and reading the name wrong, it was ridiculed by many book friends, the small editor honestly accepted criticism, not a person of that era, really did not know Erkang, erkang one is Beijing, one is Inner Mongolia, right? This is Shanxi?
I don't know which old comrade wrote it, so let's forgive it.
I want to find a good word to praise this work, at least say some neutral words, and scan my brain several times, as if it is dead.
Well, I'll talk about it later, and this issue is over.