Recently, the football controversy has aroused the attention of many people, and the former player's "I hope that everyone will scientifically criticize the footballer" statement immediately rushed to the hot search, immediately attracting more criticism. With the love of gossip in mind, I, who "focused on football for decades without watching football", immediately found the ins and outs of the controversy and could not help but sigh with emotion.
Since I am not a fan, I am not qualified to comment on football itself, and what made me think about it was a small episode that happened at the opera forum a few years ago. At that time, a famous Qin actor "had a heated discussion" with the fans on the forum, which was basically a "counter-criticism" of the fans who gave him opinions and criticized him for not acting well.
In addition to the most common "you do what you go on" remarks, the actor also said to fans, "You know what", "You don't understand the play". The implication is that only "understand the play" and "understand" to a certain extent are qualified to discuss which sentence should be sung, which action should be done, the general public, even if they like to watch the play, have seen a lot of plays, are not worthy of criticism, the implication is "not scientific enough".
There are indeed many highly educated and high-level fans in the audience, such as Zhu Jiahuan, an expert in cultural relics, Liu Zengfu, an expert in physiology, Wu Xiaoru, an expert in literary history, and Ouyang Zhongshi, a calligrapher. These gentlemen are not only famous and famous in their own professional fields, but also have deep contacts with the pear garden industry for various reasons, and are familiar with the history of opera and even opera performance, and their evaluation of actors should be "scientific enough".
So are ordinary theater fans such as me, who have no high education and are not high-level, not qualified to "point fingers" at the actor's performance?
For example, a rural boss, a lifetime like to listen to the play, the family from the radio to the tape recorder to the VCD to the choir machine is used a lot of bad, specifically into the city to see the performance of a famous actor, the actor because of the voice discomfort, suddenly there is a sentence out of tune, the boss is not qualified to say "take his family"?
For example, my next-door neighbor's part-time worker sister-in-law, who may not have finished primary school, may have gone to the city to work and support her family, and people are loyal audiences of "Pear Garden Spring" and "Voice of Qin". I gave a ticket for a famous drama, but it happened that the famous artist was not in good health, and the "search door" in "Killing the Temple" was extremely perfunctory, and the sister-in-law was not qualified to say "This person did not give us the strength to act"?
It cannot be denied that the remarks of professional critics are very important, after all, as long as they are critics, their understanding of art will always be deeper than that of ordinary people, and they often have unique views on the ideological and literary nature of their works, and their criticism can always play an important guiding role in the performance of the repertoire and even the award.
But the vast majority of fans are ordinary and ordinary, such as you and me, neither highly educated nor necessarily of a high level. But we are not deaf and blind, the actor's voice is not enough, the action is not good, can still see and hear. If the actor's voice is good enough, the program is standardized enough, and the action is in place, of course, we will not skimp on applause, anyway, applause and no charge; if today the actor is just a little worse, or even a big difference, are we not allowed to cheer and talk about opinions?
If professional actors feel that most of the audience is laymen, so "you don't understand drama" and therefore "are not qualified to criticize", they may also block their own artistic progress.
Author: Li Xiang
Edited/Reviewed: Yao Yang
Final Judge: Wang Mei