In 2020, then-U.S. Attorney General Barr delivered a speech in which Barr made it clear that 5G technology is the next era of technology that the United States has not led for the first time in a hundred years.
It can be seen that the suppression of Huawei is actually a suppression of 5G to ensure that the United States has achieved faster development in the field of 5G.
In fact, from later events, we can also see such clues, such as the United States prohibiting American companies from cooperating with Huawei, but it is allowed to involve 5G patents.
Especially at the beginning of this year, britain's former business secretary made it clear that banning Huawei is not because Huawei's equipment has what the United States calls a security problem, but is completely forced by American pressure.
At this point, the rumor that Huawei's 5G equipment has security problems has been self-defeated, which has allowed Huawei to win back the first game in 5G, and the benefits are obvious.
The United States has always used this excuse to lobby other countries not to adopt Huawei's 5G equipment, although the United States does not have any evidence.
But now that the rumors in the United States have been broken, and the same information comes from the United Kingdom, before the British MI6 side said that 5G technology is based on Huawei technology, the United Kingdom can not bypass.
Vodafone has also said that only Huawei is a true 5G supplier, and banning Huawei will make the UK lose its leadership position in the 5G era.
Obviously, all this shows that rejecting Huawei is the wrong choice, and there are no so-called security issues for Huawei's 5G equipment.
Therefore, we can see that in recent times, Huawei's overseas orders have come one after another, and now, the British side has once again come to the new news, huawei has won the second game.
Huawei pulled back the second inning
I believe that some friends still remember that in order to suppress Huawei 5G, the United States is one of the ways to create rumors, in addition, there is another way, that is, to set up an OPEN RAN alliance based on American companies.
The alliance aims to replace Huawei's 5G equipment, and the biggest advantage given is lower cost.
The reason for the establishment of this alliance is actually not difficult to understand, because the advantages of Huawei's 5G equipment, or the main advantages, have two major aspects, technology is on the one hand, so the United States uses so-called security issues to attack, and the other advantage is cost.
In terms of cost, even competitors Ericsson and Nokia have personally admitted that Huawei has indeed made the cost lower.
But now, this so-called OPEN RAN alliance is also less solid.
Recently, Watson, chief technology and information officer of BT Group, made it clear that the promise exists, but it needs to be realized, and everything has been exaggerated from the beginning, and we have not yet seen the real cost-effectiveness of OPEN RAN. And Watson acknowledges that the telecom industry has tended to over-hype from the start.
Obviously, OPEN RAN, which does not have any technical advantages, actually has no advantage in terms of cost, and from the beginning OPEN RAN is an over-hyped product, and the purpose is already obvious.
BT Group occupies a pivotal position in the global operator market, when Huawei wanted to enter the European market, the first choice was the United Kingdom, and the first operator chose British Telecom.
Therefore, the voice of British Telecom is very influential, which proves that in fact, Huawei's 5G technology and 5G equipment are more excellent.
There is no doubt that this time Huawei has won back the second round, will once again open up overseas sales channels, so that the world can see that Huawei's 5G equipment is of high quality and low price, and the security is much higher than THAT OF OPEN RAN.
Write at the end
According to recent relevant statistics, Huawei is still the first place in the global communication equipment market in 2021, with a global share of nearly 29%, achieving growth, while Nokia, which has been actively involved in OPEN RAN before, has a sharp decline in market share, which is ironic.
Therefore, in general, Huawei's development in 5G telecom operators seems to have begun to bottom out, what do you think about this?