3A counts as a P, no one should install X

1

These two days, didn't Apple issue a new product?

At the press conference, he showed the original god of play to reflect the strong performance of his chip, and also labeled the original god as a 3A game.

This directly poked two honeycombs.

It is necessary to know whether the original god is 3A The topic has been argued for more than two years, and pink and black are still in a state of tense confrontation with continuous confrontation, short suspension of fire, and large-scale conflict at any time.

This time, Apple actually took the original god to endorse itself, and also gave the original god standard 3A, the two camps directly exploded, and everyone was empty output on their own positions, sneering at their imaginary opponents.

As for whether the original god is 3A or not, in fact, I think there is no need to discuss this topic at all, because to discuss this topic, we must first solve a very simple problem:

What exactly is AAA?

Some people say that AAA is synonymous with top masterpieces.

Some people say that AAA is a representative of the industrialization of games.

Some people say that AAA means fun.

Some say that AAA is an abbreviation for bigger investment, longer development time, and more marketing spending.

At present, the most common statement is A lot of time, A lot of resources, A lot of money, note that this is the most common statement, but not everyone recognizes it, because it is not authoritative.

It can be said that they are all right.

It can also be said that what they say is wrong.

Because there is no clear definition of the 3A thing, even whether it is a positive word or a derogatory word is not clear at all.

3A is just a [marketing concept], and anyone can pinch 3A into various poses according to their own understanding.

Do you really say that apple is marking the original god with 3A?

It doesn't make sense at all.

They chose the original god only because the original god is now the most expensive mobile phone/mobile game, and taking the original god out is to show off the performance of their own chip.

You see them form a full thunder team to fight the monsters of the thunder attribute, and one look is a pose.

But I don't know when to start 3A seems to have become synonymous with a good game, it seems that as long as you say 3A, then this game must be a noble and elegant Kaolin flower, and the charm on the market is not the same.

Everyone is excited about a 3A label that Apple casually puts on, which is nothing more than that the title of 3A is very compelling, as long as it is evaluated as 3A, it is out of low-level fun.

At this point, you have to repeat the definition of AAA again, and you will find that you have no idea which definition to use.

You're right, it just doesn't make sense.

Even in the mouth of the real game Brahmin 3A is an uncompromising derogatory term, together with the New Year goods represents the over-commercialized industrial assembly line game.

And if you ask the game manufacturers, they will not use 3A to evaluate good or bad, 3A is just a neutral word to brag about when advertising.

It doesn't mean good or bad, it means I spent a lot of money on making this game.

2

Whether the original god is 3A or not depends mainly on how you define 3A.

If you look at it from the perspective of "3A = single-player buyout to make a high score masterpiece", or simply use the perspective of "3A = the apex of contemporary game technology and playability", then the original god is certainly not 3A.

But if you measure it in terms of more investment, more time, and more marketing spending, then the original god is definitely AAA.

It cost $100 million in production alone, developed for three years, had a team that was out of control at any time, and the follow-up publicity funding has always been at the forefront of the world's game industry.

If you insist on dogma, then the latter kind of look more convincing, after all, the previous standard is too emotional.

But what is the point of such a 3A standard sticker not being pasted?

After all, the last three points are not the quality of the game, but "I can spend money in particular".

If only than can spend money.

"Glory of Kings" is the true AAA.

In fact, if you think about it carefully, you will know that whether it is by the standard of a good game or by the standard of simply spending a lot of money, AAA is a strange label.

You see, World of Warcraft not only meets the criteria of being able to spend money, but also meets the criteria of the apex of the contemporary game industry, why doesn't anyone say that World of Warcraft is a triple game?

Of course, you can say that "World of Warcraft" is AAA like the original god is now on the AAA standard, but after you say it, do you feel that there is something wrong in your heart?

At the end of the day, the word AA itself is not as sacred as some people think, and it is just a commercial propaganda stunt pushed out by the commercial game industry.

Its value is not as valuable as the "divine work" that the small circle boasts every day.

"God work" is still torn out by the audience, and 3A is really just a word that is casually spewed out when the game manufacturers promote it.

3

To put it bluntly, everyone who promotes AAA is not advocating AAA games at all, but needs a word to come out as a representative of the line between bad games.

Everyone's logic is not "I play 3A so I'm noble", but "I don't play garbage games so I'm noble".

Everyone is vying for whether the original god is 3A, which is essentially a good game for the original god.

Going back to how to define the 3A is a typical debate that ends up completely forgetting what your starting point is.

In fact, the starting point of everyone's quarrel is very unified, that is, completely fed up with the rotten game in China.

Because domestic games are rotten, they can only praise the foreign game industry, because even the industrial garbage of foreign game circles is hundreds of times better than domestic games.

Because I am tired of the improper people of domestic game manufacturers, I say that I play 3A (this still depends on the definition), while angrily criticizing why domestic manufacturers can't do 3A.

And the players of the original god have never felt that the domestic game has been saved because of the original god, on the contrary, the important reason why they blow the original god is that the original god has come up with a world-class game in the domestic environment - then what are the big domestic manufacturers doing?

This is the same as the Chinese movies of ten years ago were smoked by all kinds of garbage that rubbed fast money, so everyone at that time regarded industrial Hollywood blockbusters as a panacea.

Are Hollywood movies good?

Not necessarily, it can even be said that most of it is not good, we just see a little bit of good.

Just like the AAA game is not necessarily good, there will also be "The End of america 2" such a flipping cargo.

But the problem is that even if you take these second-rate goods to the domestic industry that can also hang the smoke miasma, the bad has become good.

4

What do you think is AAA and what is AAA.

The definition of 3A doesn't make sense at all.

What matters is how we get rid of the opposite side of AAA.

If the opposing side is always in order, then the 3A, which is not superior, will be forced to become superior.

If there is no small fresh meat in the world, everyone will not invent a word called old drama bone, if there is no traffic bad film in the world, everyone will not always look forward to the emergence of dark horses in the Spring Festival file.

The abnormally high exposure of the word 3A in China is due to the abnormal rottenness of the domestic game industry.

If there were no bad games in the world, AAA would naturally change back to the marketing term of "I am rich" and would no longer be a tool for players to tear up and try to prove that they are more tasteful.

The world knows that beauty is beauty, and evil has been;

Everyone knows that what is good is good, and what is not good is good.

Only in the future, everyone plays games only to see the variety and do not need to care whether it is a pit or not, and the prosperity of gamers will really come.

Don't study 3A all day.

Don't play games, it's not good for the eyes.

Or open the fund and protect your eyes.