Excerpt: If in Xunzi's case, "quality" is the subjective basis for man's attainment of virtue, and "quality" in this sense is understood from the mind of the "Heavenly King", then this mind has a reason to take responsibility for "evil", and if so, the "evil theory of the heart" has its basis in theory.
Is the material tool subjective? Or is it a subjective (conscious) material basis? Xunzi quality with yunyun is also the material (the material is simple and the material is different, so the material is generally close to the same and the good and the beautiful or poor, the newborn cerebral palsy blind person is unusual), the material is the basis of performance, ordinary human resources can know the benevolence and righteousness of the fazheng (that is, there is a living hostage material basis that knows the right and wrong of social chaos).
There are materials and materials and performance (Xunzi structural function theory /material function theory), there are performance and can know (), ordinary people can be (knowing falsehood) ≠ nature must have ⊕ morality and morality (sex morality = sex good and evil = sex has good and evil). The material is simple and simple, and the sexual simplicity can be used as a Gawen, so Xunzi is known as the material nature of the simple, the sexual pseudo-division, the sexual pseudo-union, the base of the capital is simple and the ± the etiquette and righteousness of the text. Materiality is simple, material nature is knowledgeable, material nature is worried, sexual and pseudo-integration, pseudo-touch good and evil, good and evil order... The concept is integrated, the logic is closed, the theory is complete, and there is no delay.
If the theory of evil in the heart has a basis, then the theory of goodness of the heart is also based; the theory of evil in the heart is based on it, and the theory of sexual evil is more based (the wording of the Book of Han Lai Xun is like this, at least it has not changed since the Tang and Song dynasties), of course, the theory of "mixing good and evil in sex" is the most based (Han Confucian theory also, rubbing sexual goodness and evil frame Meng Xun two bull-headed crows take off).
Mencius's saying "sexual goodness" is to say that everyone has benevolence and righteousness or inherent benevolence and righteousness (given by heaven, to return to nature and know heaven, through mental work) [this is the premise or belief, this is nothing to discern, Meng Ke brain and chapter sentence so], later wise philosophers abstracted Mencius into abstract sexual goodness, and also created a sexual evil theory and also abstracted the theory of evil on the head of Xunzi, and the final result was that the Dong hou Han Confucian who unified Meng Xun created the general theory of "sexual good and evil mixed", And Dong Zi is the unification of the theory of sexual simplicity and the theory of human nature of MengXun that does not negate the abstract theory of good ends... History is so weird and funny!
Mencius said that everyone is benevolent and righteous (heaven is inherent in sex), of course, it can be asserted that "sexual goodness", Mencius is not a fool! The seven passions and six desires are not evil, the physiological needs and even greed are not evil (Mencius actually said that it is not sexual, the mind and magic eyes are extraordinary), but it will lead the behavior out of line and do evil and touch the evil, so Mencius talked about vigilance, cultivation, and the return to the heavens through the efforts of the heart.
Xun Quan does not talk about the benevolence and righteousness of everyone's nature, the nature of the simple and rude, the literary reason, the morality of the people, the good (no) good and evil, the good (the right reason and the peaceful rule) the evil (the sinister and rebellious) are all ordinary people's basic materials and sexual hypocrisy, the good state is also false, the evil state is also false, and it is not a thing that exists without waiting and does not happen. Simple reason, clear system.
Then post the original paragraph of xunshu on "the quality of benevolence and righteousness" (as follows) for everyone to think about. The second "evil" word should also be marked with a question mark, and the beginning of this half sentence "and" before the word ", the number can be omitted, this" and the table are juxtaposed, not the table turn.
Xun Quan deduced that the principle of right and wrong of benevolence and righteousness is recognizable [non-object agnosticism], and ordinary people also have the material instrument (physical basis, biological basis) of non-rationality (non-world incompetence), so he said that through the positive and positive sexual pseudo-union of normal materials, as a product [it depends on practical action, pseudo-theory also,], so as to understand the gods, to see heaven and earth, to the saints (it is possible to ≠ must be complete)...
There is no need to imagine that benevolence and righteousness are destiny, but the result of positive hypotheses can also reach the realm of Mencius (see also the Zipu Sage Chapter from paragraph 7 of the Treatise on Sex), and even more sober and transparent than Mencius, so Xun Quan mocked Mencius reluctantly/contrived, and did not really reach the realm of accumulation of habits and habits of nature as Zhongni said... A handful of young people still chanting words every day to prevent evil defeat and return to life, too reluctant, too much, indicating that they are not mature enough, and there is no Confucius realm.
The combination of good and evil of sex, emotion, heart, and desire, and even the combination of good and evil, × the form of material talent, × the realm of good and evil, such concepts will be endless. Analyze the truth of Meng Xun's theory of text, to take the text step by step and have a logical consciousness, to transfer words to the mathematical logic narrative above the middle school, and not to conceptually confuse the account vaulting and skating:
Everyone is born with benevolence, righteousness, and wisdom∈ humanity∈ and humanity is good within ∈ goodness. - This is the premise of Mencius's belief and deductive trick (as for the nature of lust and demand, it is not evil but can lead people to do evil, so we must always be on guard against it, we must always worry about returning to sex, and even if we want non-sex and the gentleman pulls black to block it, this is Mencius's spiritual cultivation and wording), and in order to defend and declare the overall belief in the beauty of "sexual goodness", it is not unreasonable (logical) to argue with The Confucian Confucianism is to be strong and depreciate people (immoral).
Everyone is born with rude and righteous literature, and the innate materiality is simple and unworthy (if Confucius knows that people are simple and not literate, if Pu Yu is not pondered) The material nature is inherently simple and unkind (the original is simple and evil clouds), and the material nature has no moral content and attributes The internal ∈ of morality (Zi pu = 〇, evil refutes Meng and discusses the source of etiquette and righteousness, goodness and evil: the goodness of positive etiquette and righteousness is false, and the evil of negative etiquette and righteousness is also false (paragraphs 1, 2, 4, 9, 20).
The emergence of moral good and evil is all human hypocrisy (if paragraphs 6 and 12 talk about the production of pottery and wood, and the standards of good and evil are also generated by society), pseudo is the basic material, the basic resource is simple (the material is functional and sexual pseudo-union, paragraphs 4, 7, 14 talk about the material sexual function), and the ± etiquette and righteousness from the simple and far-reaching simplicity are each developed on the material sexual pseudo-union, and the good and evil on the park are not good, and the good and evil are false. - This is Xun Quan's belief deduction and reasoning trick, which is more about logical truth and falsification, but the premise of belief (whether there is a courtesy or not in the nature of the nature, that is, the righteousness of the nature or the morality of the nature) is very different from Meng Ke, and the tao is different and does not conspire, and the respective dharma eyes think that it is also true.
(Lin Guihao 2022.03.01 To be continued)
Attached to the discussion of the day:
[Zhang Wanlin] If good and evil are the result of hypocrisy, then what is the basis for choosing good over evil? For example, if apples are put together with peaches, why do you choose apples because I like to eat apples. Is the choice between good and evil the same? If this is the case, it means that people naturally like to be good. Xun Ziyi: Natural, sex is also.
[Lin Guihao] We have to choose what is the basis for good rather than evil - that is the basis of Brother Zhang's deduction of his own ideas, and how to interpret the defense can be. But the natural duty of learning is to find out the truth, the truth of Mencius, the truth of Xunzi, do not take the abstract belief of "(positive) sexual goodness" to persuade Xunzi, the same reason do not have to convince Xunzi that "the material nature is not good, the sexual hypocrisy is good and evil" or even "the material nature is the evil of partial danger and chaos", this is impossible, the moral judgment of the material is different, and the premise of the theoretical system is different.
People should know that they are limited, and it is important to accurately understand the ancients. Chapters and sentences cannot be read thoroughly, and how to interpret Kong Mengxun may be too late and counterproductive. Embracing Mencius should embrace the right, not scattered, chapters and sentences, generally and meteorologically untouchable (if you get it, you will be able to practice the shape of life, if Mencius Xionghong is like this in his life), is not pure rice grain Mengkeyi, this is condemned by Zhongni.
（2022.03.01）
【Digression】
Meng Xun's theory of sexual goodness and unkindness is a propositional problem of whether human nature has a sense of etiquette, and there is no doubt that the words and righteousness of the chapters and sentences cannot be overthrown... Only the sophistry of "Xunzi sexual evil theory is the lack of etiquette and righteousness and goodness of human nature" is the most comprehensive level of reconciliation, of course, this reconciliation ignores the strange creation of the Xunshu concept system and logical righteousness of the "existence of dangerous and contradictory evil (sexual evil) of the nature of the simple material (〇礼義)".
Without the real Xun Situation, it is impossible to restore Mencius's spiritual beliefs and moral arrogance; without the real Mencius, it is impossible to restore the ideological rigor and intellectual arrogance of Xun Condition... Just look at each other as mirrors, and look at each other in the "demon" mirror also. Yu Dawei said that Chen Yinke was not good at Mencius, but it was interesting to pay more attention to Xunzi.
No matter what form Mencius is regarded as truth, no matter what form Zhu Lu takes, it is the arrogant ideological impulse of moral truth (truth) that is well-intentioned and obscures (manufactured) (Fang Dongmei knows the metaphysical impulse), this truth is also, yan zhiye, Socrates knows the wisdom of writing poetry.
All so-called Chinese philosophical propositions and concepts must be scientifically examined, even Meng Zhu's spiritualism must also gain insight into its spiritual language mechanism, such as Hu Shi has insight into the medieval religious spirit of Song Taoism, pointing out that it is a group of Confucian Taoist worlds. Some philosophers are conservative, reactionary, collective conceptual worlds, and Russell and Popper have pointed out the reactionary nature of Plato and Hegel's philosophy (metaphysics is related to value intensification)...
The philosophical circle was controlled by Hu Shi's faction, so there was no salvation, there was no way out, Zhang Dainian's brother Zhang Shenfu in the 1930s knew, not to mention Hu Shi and Fu Si Nianye.
(Lin Guihao 2022.03.02)