When it comes to large space family cars, I think the Odyssey should be the first model that everyone thinks of, because it not only has a large space, the seat layout is also flexible and changeable, it can adapt to different use scenarios, and it is a good helper for proper home use. In fact, in addition to Odyssey, Trumpchi and Wuling in our own brands have also launched similar models - M6 and Capgemini. Then again, who of these two cars can win the title of 100,000-level family car honor student? Let's compare it today.
(M6 PRO)
(Capgemini 280T)
In terms of models, we chose the 2021 PRO 270T DCT Luxury Trumpchi M6 (hereinafter referred to as the M6 PRO) with a guidance price of 129,800, and the 2022 280T 1.5T automatic flagship Wuling Capgemini (hereinafter referred to as the Capgemini 280T) with a guidance price of 125,800, because the prices of the two vehicles are relatively close and they are new models in the car series. Without further ado, let's go straight to the comparison session.
Regarding the appearance and styling of the two cars, the author believes that the appearance of the two cars is not bad, the M6 PRO has a business atmosphere, and the Capgemini 280T is relatively young and fashionable. As for which one looks better? I think everyone has their own answer, so I will not repeat it here, let's skip it and enter the space that everyone is concerned about.
In terms of body size, the M6 PRO has a length, width and height of 4780/1837/1730mm and a wheelbase of 2810mm, while the Capgemini 280T has a length, width and height of 4875/1880/1700mm and a wheelbase of 2800mm. From the book parameters, with similar wheelbase, the Longer Capgemini 280T has more advantages in terms of space, so is the actual performance the same? Know that the cabin space depends not only on the size of the body, but also on the seat layout, space optimization and other factors.
In terms of seat layout, the M6 PRO adopts a "2+2+3" seven-seat layout, while the Capgemini 280T has a "2+2+2" six-seat layout. The M6 PRO with one more seat, although more people than the Capgemini 280T pull, but the experience of the third row of passengers when fully loaded is not very good, slightly crowded. In contrast, the third row of the Capgemini 280T is slightly more spacious. In addition, it is worth mentioning that the third row of seats in both cars can be "hidden" under the floor, thereby improving the load capacity of the trunk.
In addition to the third row of seats, the second row of seats of the two cars also have different performance, first look at the M6 PRO, its seat cushion is relatively wide, also equipped with armrests, the riding experience is not bad, functional aspects support seat front and rear adjustment, seat back adjustment; and then look at Capgemini 280T, its seat is also relatively wide, and the use of ergonomic design that fits the curve of the human body, the comfort is better. In terms of functionality, the Capgemini 280T supports seat front, rear, left and right and leg rest adjustments, while its seat back can also be placed flat.
In terms of space and seating, we will talk about this, and then we will look at the differences in power between the two sides. The M6 PRO is equipped with a 1.5T turbocharged engine with a maximum horsepower of 169Ps and a peak torque of 265N·m, which is matched by a 7-speed dual-clutch transmission with a comprehensive fuel consumption of 7.5L/100km; capgemini 280T also uses a 1.5T engine, but its maximum horsepower reaches 177Ps, with a peak torque of 290N·m, matched with a CVT stepless gearbox that can simulate 8 speeds, and the NEDC comprehensive fuel consumption is 7.6L/7.6L/m. 100km。
In terms of actual experience, the power performance of capgemini 280T is indeed better than that of the M6 PRO, which is specifically manifested in terms of starting and speeding up, after all, its torque is greater, and the turbine intervenes earlier. However, one thing to say, the M6 PRO's chassis performs better, and it is cleaner and cleaner when dealing with large potholes.
Finally, in the current intelligent network part of young consumers, although the M6 PRO is equipped with an 8-inch LCD touch screen, it does not support the Internet of Vehicles and OTA upgrade services, fortunately, the CarLife interconnection form of equipment, so that it can also meet the entertainment needs of users' daily car; Capgemini 280T is equipped with Wuling's latest Ling OS Lingxi system, providing NetEase Cloud Music, Himalaya FM, Wuling Radio, online navigation and other applications, and supports mobile phone remote control of cars, Voice-controlled car and other interactive methods. Moreover, capgemini 280T voice control car can not only recognize the user's continuous voice commands, but also respond very quickly, 0.8 seconds can respond.
Overall, through the above aspects, the M6 PRO and Capgemini 280T space can meet the needs of multi-population family cars. However, from the perspective of seat functionality, power, intelligent networking, etc., capgemini 280T's performance is better. Of course, the M6 PRO is not without advantages, such as its chassis is worthy of praise. However, with reference to the configuration table, it can be found that the configuration of capgemini 280T is also more "convincing", such as full matrix LED headlights, exterior mirror heating, driver's seat heating, active braking, etc. are all configurations that the M6 PRO does not have. Therefore, in the case of a small price gap, I prefer to give the title of honor student to Capgemini 280T.