laitimes

Putin Musk asked the question, but the answer was the whole world

Putin Musk asked the question, but the answer was the whole world

The 133rd original article of the "Yao Yan Cargo Heavy" public account

It takes about 3 minutes to read and help click "Like" and "Watching" at the end of the article!

Congratulations to the "Onion Barrel Combination" for winning the Beijing Winter Olympics figure skating pair skating free skating competition!

Sui Wenjing and Han Cong, making up for the regret of missing the highest podium at the Pyeongchang Olympic Games four years ago, with a difference of 0.43 points, set a world record for the competition score, and won the Olympic championship deservedly!

There are four events in figure skating, two-person champion Sui Wenjing and Han Cong (China), men's singles champion Chen Wei (USA), women's singles champion Serbakova (Russia) and ice dance champion Parsi (France).

The PCS (art score) of the "Onion Barrel Combination" was lower than the second place 0.13 points, but by twisting around this difficult action, it won 5.63 points at once, and the score was not watery at all, which fully proved that hard work and continuous challenge to the peak of difficulty are the magic weapons to win.

This is similar to China's current situation in the economy, science and technology and other fields, hard-working makes us stand at the forefront of the world's manufacturing industry, but the influence and profits are not satisfactory, often caught in the problem maker - do the problem maker game.

What the problem maker is good at is the task of clear rules and rewarding investment, which often attracts many competitors, low replacement costs, and small benefits. On the contrary, the author must constantly explore new areas and first gain control of the new power structure.

At the same time that the Beijing Winter Olympics were being held in a lively manner, the Political Situation in Europe was also booming. The United States and Europe unanimously accused Russia of preparing to invade Ukraine, but it did not actually happen, and Russia's withdrawal of troops was false and real, turning the world around the world around.

In this matter, Putin is a well-deserved problem maker, while Europe is the standard problem maker, and the United States is not willing to become a problem maker, deliberately making trouble, trying to reverse the situation and become a problem maker, and now it seems that the effect is good.

In June 2020, Russia accounted for 23% of its foreign exchange reserves, surpassing dollar assets; Nord Stream II between Russia and Germany, launched in 2011 and fully completed in September 2021; Russia and China signed an agreement to supply 100 million tons of oil for 10 years during the Beijing Winter Olympics, and so on.

Russia has been plotting to teach Ukraine a lesson for a long time, and Putin finally shot this year and gave the test questions to the West, and the reactions of various questioners were different.

Putin Musk asked the question, but the answer was the whole world

Excluding the British and French, both soy saucers, Johnson and Macron both visited Russia, but there was no practical action other than chanting slogans.

Germany and Ukraine, the two main problem solvers, are very embarrassed, and suddenly find that no matter what action they take, they will fall into the trap of the exam questions. I am not a problem solver, and I have not studied hard, my examination skills are unfamiliar, and my scores are bound to fail.

Don't look at the American Biden known as the "sleeping king", but there are indeed capable people under his hands, and he has broken himself from being a problem maker to a problem maker. Since Putin has put up a fight to fight, he will tell the world that he wants to fight, but he is determined not to contribute, so he will shake those rogue little brothers.

Now it has become a passive Russia, originally wanting to make a fight to force Europe to make concessions to gain benefits, but now it has become, fight is not, not to fight is not, it is not to fight, it is not to be reversed by the United States to become a problem maker.

What these European writers cannot understand is that without changing the power structure, the returns are diminishing and profitable, and the questioners are constantly exploring and building new power systems, mastering and controlling key resources.

After such a toss, European writers such as Germany will find that it is very passive to rely entirely on the United States. Next, the approval of Nord Stream II will be accelerated, France will be more energetic to win China over, the approval of the China-EU Investment Agreement will be restarted, and Russia will get China's resource orders, no loss at all.

There are more cases of such a problem maker-solver game in the technology community, and the most successful problem solver is Musk. Tesla's electric cars, SpaceX's recyclable rockets, Boring's tunnel excavators, one by one, are all test questions for the world.

The difference between a questioner and a questioner is that the former is driven by short-term interests, while the latter is driven by interests and beliefs. So you will see that Tesla is about to soar, Toyota Akio is still angrily scolding electric vehicles, and the transformation of Volkswagen and GM is reluctant.

Musk's dream is to make humans into a multi-planet species, the first stop is to colonize Mars, and there is no oil on Mars, only by solar power, so his first thing is to do everything in the Tesla electric car.

There is no atmosphere on the surface of Mars, and he can only live underground, so he created a boring tunnel to transport things cheaply to Mars, then develop SpaceX's recyclable rockets. You have to build a house on Mars, so don't be too surprised that Musk is going to start a real estate company next.

Even if the writer is not driven by short-term interests, he will waste sleep and forget about his interests and beliefs. Because doing things themselves is very interesting, the improvement of their own ability and insight in the process of doing things is more valuable. The problem maker will chase some superficial bubbles, and even if he knows that it is a bubble, he will also deceive himself into chasing, just because the interests are tempting.

With Musk, the author of the problem, the world's problem makers have taken action, such as China's electric car three small: Weilai, ideal, Xiaopeng. A closer look at their behavior and strategy, completely within musk's examination questions, now looks attractive, the future will inevitably follow the old road of low profits can be replaced by strong Chinese manufacturing.

On the two exam questions of recyclable rockets and tunneling companies, the world's performance is even worse, and there has been no qualified questioner so far. At present, only China has this potential, but it is only a state-owned company, and I am afraid that it will be embarrassed. In addition to watching Musk become the king of the new power system, we can only wait for new problem makers to appear in the future.

Musk only suffered losses on cryptocurrencies, and Tesla is said to have lost as much as $1 billion on cryptocurrencies in the first quarter. Musk plays this, mainly to seize the right to print money on Mars, and the temporary fluctuations are not enough to make him stop.

Putin Musk asked the question, but the answer was the whole world

Sometimes the problem maker and the problem solver seem to be doing the same thing, but when the trough comes, they will part ways, the problem maker will be a bird and beast scattered, and the problem maker will continue to iterate tirelessly, and when the time comes, the problem maker will soar.

According to Musk's past urine nature, it is inevitable to find a new power structure on cryptocurrencies, create a new system, and gain control. At that point, people who are cautious about cryptocurrencies but want to participate will shift their enthusiasm to Tesla, and Tesla stock will skyrocket.

There have been American politicians who have ridiculed China, "Looking around, nothing is invented by Chinese", which is indeed a fact, and it fully shows that Chinese, at least in modern times, has never been the dilemma of the problem makers.

There are many articles analyzing the reasons, and I will not repeat them. I hope that everyone thinks about whether they are the author of the problem or the problem maker on major issues, such as career, feelings, etc.? How do you turn yourself into a problem solver?

Please help "like"! I know you're "watching" yo~

Read on