Text/Dasu
Title: Promised to return the mobile phone to 700 yuan, get the mobile phone suspect trap, passengers ask the driver to return money
After losing things, the owners are more anxious and want to get things back, especially some valuable or important, in order to get things back will also offer high rewards.
Logically, the reward was given to the other party, and the things were successfully obtained, and both parties also fulfilled their obligations, and the matter should end here, but some coincidences in communication will also make the owner suspicious.
For example, if someone induces the amount of remuneration to be increased, and then finds something after the real money is added, the owner may suspect that he has encountered a routine, and the person who induces it is the person who picked up the mobile phone.
There is a lost owner in Qingdao, Shandong Province, who suspects that he has encountered a routine, although the mobile phone is in hand, but it has spent a lot of money.
Things start from January 25th, Xiao Li is still a student, went out to drink with friends that day, and was ready to come back at 7 o'clock in the morning on the 25th, because his friend drank a little too much, he sent his friend home first.
I took a taxi from Wuyue Plaza, sent my friend to Xiangjiang Century Park, helped my friend upstairs when I got off the bus, and said yes to the driver, let the driver wait in the same place, and he immediately came down to go somewhere else.
Because his friend was a little drunk, Xiao Li was worried that the mobile phone would be crushed during the support process, so he put his mobile phone in the passenger seat, and when he returned from sending his friend, the taxi had already driven away.
The police later found the driver of the taxi, but the driver said that he was not driving himself, but another driver was driving, but also promised to help him contact the driver, but it would take a certain amount of time.
In order to retrieve the mobile phone as soon as possible, Xiao Li also stopped a taxi on the side of the road, and then asked the driver to help send a message in the relevant group, saying that returning the mobile phone would be a heavy reward, and then someone added a friend.
The other party is not the driver who picked up the mobile phone, but out of enthusiasm to help him forward, when mentioning whether the reward of 500 yuan is enough, the other party said that it was not too sufficient, and Xiao Li increased the reward to 700 yuan.
Soon the driver who really picked up the mobile phone contacted him, and the other party also took the initiative to make concessions, saying that it was enough to give a 600 yuan, and the two sides agreed to go to the location to get the mobile phone, but Xiao Li also took the police with him.
It may be that the other party saw it, the day was not to get the mobile phone, the driver put a harsh word, do not give 700 yuan do not want to take the mobile phone, and finally gave 700 yuan first, the driver put the mobile phone in the designated position.
Although it was successfully retrieved the mobile phone, Xiao Li suspected that he encountered a routine, and the enthusiastic forwarder may be dragging, deliberately letting him raise the price, not to mention that this is not a pure loss of mobile phone situation.
He let the driver wait in place, but the driver drove away, so he believes that the driver should not ask for money, should take the initiative to return the mobile phone, and find media exposure is also to return the reward.
Of course, the above are his personal statements, and the driver's statement is a little different.
Through the contact information provided by Xiao Li, the reporter first called the driver to inquire, and the driver described the situation of the day, when Xiao Li and his friend got off the car together, and the two did not pay the fare of 25 yuan.
The driver got out of the car to recover the fare, and when the driver wanted to return the fare to the car, he did not find the mobile phone at the first time, but drove a distance to find that there was a mobile phone in the passenger seat.
The mobile phone is not deliberately placed in the passenger seat, but Xiao Li fell in the passenger seat, waiting until the driver picked it up and checked it, then there was no power to shut down, not the driver himself turned off.
At that time, the passenger did not let the driver wait, just got on the car and said that he wanted to go to two places, and then changed his mouth not to follow the taxi, and then the driver would drive away from the scene by himself.
In response to the situation said by the driver, Xiao Li admitted that there was a matter of paying the fare, but insisted that the driver was waiting in place, and the reporter also called the taxi company to inquire, and the other party replied to check the monitoring.
It is indeed similar to what the driver said, the two passengers got out of the car without paying the fare, the driver stopped and chased after the past to beg, but did not pay attention to verify the recording, whether it was said to wait in place is not clear.
At present, passengers and drivers are sticking to their own opinions, and passengers still have not been able to return the reward.
brief summary
What the situation was on that day is now difficult to figure out, after all, the passengers and drivers have already got off the car, even if they go to retrieve the recording in the car, basically can not record anything.
However, at the beginning, the passengers did not truthfully explain the situation, but only picked on the favorable aspects of themselves, concealed the unfavorable places for themselves, and were already inferior when the theory was confronted.
Itself is suspected of being tricked by the driver, the passenger can also find the driver to theorize, the result of the real situation is concealed partly, and then go to confront the driver, but it becomes unreasonable.
I want to say that I still have to be honest with myself, and I should make it clear what the situation is, whether it is beneficial to myself or not, I must explain it truthfully and clearly, so that I will not suffer losses when reasoning with others.
What do you think about this?