laitimes

Why does the United States suppress Huawei, but China does not suppress Apple? It lies in the contribution and fungibility of the other party

According to the latest data, in the fourth quarter of 2021, Apple became the first place in the global market and the first place in the Chinese market. In contrast, Huawei, in the fourth quarter of 2021, fell out of China's top 5 and fell out of the global top 10.

So many people are uneven, saying that Apple can be unimpeded in China, and Huawei is suppressed by the United States, which eventually leads to an 82% decline in mobile phones in 2021, falling to the altar, why don't we suppress Apple, and let Apple become the first place in China?

Why does the United States suppress Huawei, but China does not suppress Apple? It lies in the contribution and fungibility of the other party

In fact, suppressing the other party does not suppress the other party, mainly depending on the other party's contribution to Party B and replaceability, if the other party's contribution to themselves is relatively large, suppress the other party, let themselves lose more, certainly will not be suppressed. If the other party's contribution to themselves is not so great, and the other party is replaceable, it is of course to suppress if you want to suppress.

For the United States, Huawei's contribution is mainly as a large buyer, purchasing chips, software, services, etc. from many companies in the United States, or providing 4G/5G services for American operators.

But these can be replaced, such as operators do not look for Huawei, can find Nokia, Ericsson to provide 4G/5G equipment, services and so on.

Why does the United States suppress Huawei, but China does not suppress Apple? It lies in the contribution and fungibility of the other party

If Huawei does not purchase chips from Intel, Qualcomm, and Micron, Huawei's market has declined, but the markets of Apple, Xiaomi, Samsung, etc. will rise up, and they will also purchase chips and other products from Intel, Qualcomm, and Micron, in fact, the loss to American companies will not be particularly large.

After all, Huawei does not build factories in the United States, provides fewer jobs for the United States, and pays less taxes in the United States, so the United States can suppress Huawei, because it has little loss to itself, but it has a greater impact on Huawei and Chinese technology.

Why does the United States suppress Huawei, but China does not suppress Apple? It lies in the contribution and fungibility of the other party

And we look at Apple, Apple's Top200 suppliers, Chinese manufacturers accounted for 50%+, Apple's manufacturing is mainly placed in Chinese mainland, there are millions of workers working for Apple's manufacturing.

There are also many software companies in China, through the Appstore to obtain their own income, it can be said that Apple has provided a large number of jobs for China, paid a huge amount of taxes.

If Apple is forced away, Apple may be affected, such as moving manufacturing centers to Vietnam, India and other places, which will lead to rising costs, etc., but the loss of millions of jobs at home is far more serious than the suppression of Apple.

What's more, we have been working hard to create the best business environment in the world, welcome the world's giants to develop in China, and establish a fair and just market environment, based on this, we cannot create this "hooligan behavior", so we do not suppress Apple.

Read on