In the American sports world, this saying is popular, "Playing football with good health, playing the NBA with poor health" is popular. It means the physical quality of playing in the NBA, which is far inferior to playing football. Is this really the case, I guess many people have such a question, but after looking at these photos today, you naturally have the answer. We often say that "there is truth in the picture", and photos can give you the most intuitive answer.
First of all, let's talk about the NBA's good athletes, their muscles that are quite outstanding. For example, we are familiar with James, Howard, O'Neill, Carl Malone, their muscles are very strong. It is also because of their strong muscles that they can effectively avoid injuries, and when these young people are young, they are rarely injured.
In addition to the thick muscles, there are also stars with clear lines like Aaron Gordon, Westbrook, Iguodala, David Robinson and so on. They only say that the muscles are not so developed, but the muscle lines are very beautiful and look very beautiful. It is not easy to train such muscles, in addition to training, you also need to have such muscle genes.
As you can see, there are many different types of muscle men in the NBA, but that is not the majority, and rugby is different. Rugby is almost all muscle men, only a very small number of positions are not so high for muscle requirements, here different types of muscle figure you can find, many are ceiling level, we can feel through photos.
After looking at the photos, you should believe it, the body of the football player, that is really much better than the NBA in general. The circumference and line clarity of that muscle are much stronger than those of NBA stars. Both movements rely heavily on physical confrontation, which at first glance is really not a level. If you can succeed in football, you can most likely succeed in the NBA, and if the NBA can succeed, you may not be able to play football.