How to interpret the interview with Sima Nan on China International Satellite TV?

After watching these three episodes, netizens have basically no objection to the intention of Sima Nan and supporting Sima Nan of China International Satellite TV Station. But what is the nature of this Hong Kong-based media? Why was Sima Nan interviewed by this media, and what does this mean? Netizens have more discussions and different interpretations.

Most of the netizens who supportEd Sima Nan applauded the interview with this media. But some people say: This media is the largest self-media. Some people say that this media is not even a third-stream media. Some people also said: This media is a grass platform team. Others say: This media is rubbing traffic and so on.

I've done a video on this issue and told me what I think. Some situations have not yet been mentioned, today, let's make another video, which is a supplement to the previous issue.

Like everyone else, I also don't know the real inside story, if I really know the inside story, I can't say it here, it is precisely because I don't understand the inside story, it is my own judgment that I dare to communicate with you.

First, I believe that China International Satellite Television, as a hong Kong-based state-owned enterprise media, is by no means arbitrary in launching a special report on Sima Nan at this critical time.

Everyone can search on the Internet to know that China International Satellite TV Is affiliated with China International Satellite Tv Corporation, registered in Hong Kong on December 13, 2018, and officially broadcast the program on January 13, 2019.

Founded in 1984, China International Television Corporation has maintained sustained and stable rapid growth after asset restructuring and institutional adjustment in 1997, and is the largest and most profitable media company in Chinese mainland.

It is precisely because China International Satellite TV Has just been registered in Hong Kong, and the time is too short. Not known by mainland netizens, if there is no interview with Sima Nan this time, many people may not know that there is such a China International Satellite TV. It is precisely because of her lack of understanding that this is the reason for all these wild speculations.

From this, we have made it clear that China International Satellite TV is a wholly-owned state-owned enterprise that has just been established in Hong Kong.

Just from the name "China International Satellite TV", we can also know that this is a large state-owned media. Because a media enterprise is registered with the word "China", the general private and personal media can never be registered, nor is it allowed. Can hang the word "China" and it is a state-owned enterprise, what does it mean? What's the origin? I don't need to explain it.

I personally understand that the main reason why the state has registered and established a "China International Satellite TV" in Hong Kong in the name of China International Satellite Television Corporation, rather than CCTV or China International Television, has set up a branch media in Hong Kong is mainly because we have adopted a policy of "Hong Kong people governing Hong Kong and a high degree of autonomy" for Hong Kong.

If it is obviously inappropriate for our party's news organizations to establish branches directly in Hong Kong, it is easy for the West to seize the "handle" and attack them. It is more appropriate for China International Satellite Television Company to set up a satellite TV media that operates according to the market, and it is more convenient and flexible to work. After so many years of Hong Kong's return to the motherland, it is a great pity that without our media and without occupying the position of public opinion, it cannot but be said.

Before the return of Hong Kong, our office in Hong Kong was basically composed of the "Hong Kong Branch of Xinhua News Agency", and although the president of this branch was nominally a bureau chief, in fact, the people who held this position were heavyweights, such as the first president was Qiao Guanhua, and the one before the return was Zhou Nan, which was basically a high post and a low allocation. It is nominally a branch of Xinhua News Agency, but in fact it assumes the functions of a government office.

Of course, now that Hong Kong has returned to the motherland, our government has a special office in Hong Kong.

However, as far as the propaganda media are concerned, China International Satellite TELEVISION Station can also be said to be the media of the first state-owned enterprise established in Hong Kong after the return of Hong Kong.

According to the management system and working principles of our state-owned enterprises, they are still party-led enterprises, and although the state-owned media in Hong Kong may have a relatively loose degree of freedom, they will never depart from the party's leadership. The personnel selected by the international satellite television will never be the "grass and taiwan team" as some people say, and they will work in the special environment of Hong Kong, and these personnel will need to withstand the test of politics.

Sima Nan's questioning association caused such a big storm of public opinion, the whole country has attracted attention, at this juncture, by the media of a state-owned enterprise in Hong Kong to interview Sima Nan, obviously will not be the media's arbitrary behavior, if it is not authorized by a certain level of institutions, I personally believe that as a state-owned media, before the investigation conclusions of the relevant government departments come out, generally will not be their own decision to interview Sima Nan, moreover, the tendency of this interview program is so obvious.

Even the non-state-owned media of Phoenix Satellite TV only made a debate program of "one tiger and one seat", although the host showed obvious tendencies, but after all, it was a debate program, and it could not explain who to support and who to deny. The interview program of China International Satellite TV is completely different, completely in line with Sima Nan, and let Sima Nan also talk about the problem of questioning association in the program. Clear-eyed people can see that this media is just supporting Sima Nan, which even some of the media and big V public knowledge that support Lenovo have nothing to say. They should understand their psychology better than anyone.

Second, no matter what way you want to send a signal. This storm of public opinion caused by Sima Nan's questioning association has been fermented for more than two months, and now there is still no sign of cooling, and the number of problems exposed, the confrontation of the camps, and the wide range of influences can be said to be unprecedented.

The relevant government departments have not had a single statement, and the mainstream media have all watched from the sidelines, which is indeed a bit too difficult to go through, and to go deeper, this is also too much to take the public opinion of the people seriously. Although it takes a certain amount of time to investigate such a major and complex issue, after all, it has been more than two months, public opinion is still heating up, and it is time to send a signal to the public in any way or method.

Third, before the relevant departments make a conclusion, what methods and methods should be used to transmit the signal? If it is obviously not appropriate to use official mainstream media, the conclusion can be published by the mainstream media, and it is obviously inappropriate and unrealistic for the signal to be transmitted by the mainstream media. Not long ago, a public account of a certain news agency just released a propaganda film, which can cause such a storm of opposing interpretations, indicating that this is not possible. Therefore, the promotional video was deleted on the media's public account only for a one-day trip, which is one of the reasons.

Having the State-owned media in Hong Kong interview Sima Nan is a very suitable choice, which can not only play a role in transmitting signals, but also maintain a certain degree of flexibility. You can interpret it as you like, and this is an interview with Sima Nan by a Hong Kong-based media.

The above three points are just my personal understanding, of course, with my personal tendencies, right and wrong, let everyone comment on it.