According to the news of the overseas network on January 20, at today's regular press conference of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, some malicious foreign journalists asked "whether China has provided military assistance to Kazakhstan in the recent chaos", to which spokesman Zhao Lijian responded: China is maintaining close communication with Kazakhstan and will provide assistance within its capacity according to the needs of Kazakhstan, and China has a positive attitude towards matters conducive to restoring social peace and stability in Kazakhstan, reviving the economy, and improving people's livelihood.
In short: China has not used military means or provided military assistance to help Kazakhstan quell the unrest; the reason why the foreign journalists who raised the issue are ill-intentioned is because under the CSCE treaty signed by Kazakhstan, it cannot accept military assistance from countries other than CSCE members, after all, it is the fragile belly of Russia's big cat, and they cannot tolerate other countries to show their military presence here, even if China can provide assistance, it will only be non-military.
In fact, considering the purpose of the initiators to launch the "color revolution" in Kazakhstan, it is not difficult to understand why the Western journalists have "bad intentions", because the actual promoters of the "color revolution" actually want to use the contradictions between China and Russia in Central Asia to provoke Sino-Russian relations, for example, the British media recently hyped up "the former president of Kazakhstan is taking political asylum in China" and "China provides military assistance to Kazakhstan", which completely exposed the purpose of the initiators.
For example, if President Putin is about to arrive in Beijing on February 4 to attend the opening ceremony of the Beijing Winter Olympics and will hold a summit of Chinese and Russian leaders, the two sides will brief and discuss a series of issues, including the situation in Ukraine, so it is clear that the two sides will also discuss the situation in Kazakhstan, and even negotiate on their respective interests and operational boundaries on this issue.
At that time, it is meaningless to hype up some topics now to play the illusion of "Sino-Russian confrontation in Kazakhstan", and even the result of this "color revolution" is that the situation in Kazakhstan has finally led the situation in Kazakhstan to a situation favorable to Russia.
And Russia will not let go of the initiators of the "color revolution" in Kazakhstan so easily: on January 15, three Russian tank landing ships set off from the port of Kaliningrad to an unknown destination, and on January 17, they sailed through the Greater Belt Strait to the Atlantic Ocean, and NATO temporarily lost tracking of the three Russian warships.
In this regard, the Western media have speculated about where the "missing" Russian tank landing ship is going. Is it the Black Sea Crimean region or Central Asia? And what exactly is Russia's intention? In fact, it does not matter what kind of storms and waves can be stirred up by the tank companies on these three warships, but they play a frightening deterrent role like nuclear weapons, and the Biden administration's rash moves may be ushering in a total rout in their diplomacy with Russia.
Although Biden has previously said that he will bring "nuclear explosion" economic sanctions to Russia, in fact, he almost asked Putin to save face until the end, but the latter seems to be unwilling to give this face at all, Russia has now begun to withdraw diplomats in Ukraine, and in Kazakhstan they also have to help eliminate militants supported by foreign forces, and the West may have to watch this happen.
And just when the Russian-Ukrainian conflict seems to be on the verge of erupting, Biden once again issued an ultimatum to Putin: if Russia occupies Ukraine, the United States will let it suffer "disaster", including cutting off the Russian central bank's connection with swift, then Russia will not be able to use the dollar for trading, and the United States will increase the size of its military in Europe and the United States, and NATO will tighten the noose on Russia.
But I think this may not be enough to deter Russia, because they now have other foreign trade channels to use, such as China, not to mention Putin's experience in dealing with the West for twenty or thirty years in power is very rich, what scenes can be said that he has not seen, Biden is now this old bottom Putin pinched to death, completely eat now the United States does not dare to tear up the face.
Of course, Biden has lost his old face in Ukraine and Kazakhstan, and he will definitely spread his anger elsewhere next, such as in the Taiwan Strait, regaining face in the South China Sea, stirring up India to pick things up on the border, and so on, so the recent DPP propaganda of the US vice president may not meet with Lai Ching-te, the number two figure in the Taiwan Democratic Progressive Party.
Because the White House knows that even if Russia eats Ukraine, it will be a European country first, but if it cannot hinder China's reunification and rejuvenation, the United States will lose its dominance in the Western Pacific region and even world hegemony.